Wednesday 30 November 2016

Is This the World’s Most Expensive Paint Job?

After owning a car for a while, some owners find themselves wondering if they should paint their car. Some skimp on the paint job due to the price, while some go all out. But, what about those who spend five figures for an optional paint job?

Car Detailing Phoenix

(Related – McLaren Unveils Track Pack for 570S)

In a video uploaded by Vehicle Virgins, we get the chance to see one of the world’s most expensive paint jobs. His friend had purhcased a McLaren 675LT Spider, but instead of going with a normal factory finish, he opted for something a little different.

When viewed from different angles this McLaren changes its color, turning the car into a rolling chameleon. How much did it cost to get such a finish? $60,000. That means the paint on his car cost as much as the base price of a new Porsche Cayenne. Insane? Yes. Unheard of? No. This isn’t the first time we’ve seen a finish like this on a McLaren (C.J. Wilson’s P1). Also, according to Jalopnik, the price of the Porsche 918 Spyder’s Liquid Metal Chrome Blue Paint costs $63,000.

Is This the World’s Most Expensive Paint Job?

http://blog.dupontregistry.com/news/worlds-expensive-paint-job/embed/#?secret=k5fUogpSOc

var featureBoxVar = “”;
Source: http://cardetailingphoenix.com/index.php/2016/11/30/is-this-the-worlds-most-expensive-paint-job/




source https://cardetailingphx.wordpress.com/2016/12/01/is-this-the-worlds-most-expensive-paint-job/

Tuesday 29 November 2016

The Clarkson Review: 2016 Bentley Mulsanne Speed

PEOPLE WHO live near a busy road often moan about traffic noise, and they have my sympathy. I’d rather listen to a wounded hare than a motorway. And I’d rather live in Svalbard than near a busy roundabout.

There are many reasons why traffic makes such a din. Motorbikes are a big source, and so far as I can tell from my vantage point in west London, they’re getting even louder. When I come to power, the banishment of these hideous and ugly machines from the roads will be near the top of my “to do” list.

Buses are noisy too, and I think it would make sense to get rid of them as well. This would force poor people to use bicycles instead, and that would cause them to be less fat. Which would mean there’d be less of a drain on the National Health Service. Speaking of which — ambulances. Do they really need sirens that can be heard 20 miles away?


View the Bentley Mulsannes for sale on driving.co.uk


With cars it’s a different story. With the exception of some found in extremely expensive supercars that you never really encounter, modern-day engines and exhaust systems are pretty much silent.

Bob Seger once sang about being on tour — “You can listen to the engine moanin’ out his one-note song” — but he’s wide of the mark. Because in fact between 75% and 90% of the noise made by a car on a motorway comes from the tyres.

It’s not just the sound of the rubber gripping the road; it’s the sound of the air in the tread pattern being compressed, and it’s all amplified because a tyre is basically a big echo chamber.

And that brings us to the Bentley Mulsanne Speed that you see photographed this morning. It was delivered to my office by two earnest chaps, who were at pains to point out the various interesting features. But the one that stopped me in my tracks was the Dunlop rubber, which, they said, had been tuned for quietness.

They weren’t kidding. At 70mph this car is as near as makes no difference silent. It’s a huge thing, with the aerodynamic properties — and weight — of a house, but it barges its way through, and over, the elements with all the aural fuss of a butterfly alighting on a buddleia petal.

It’s not just quiet for the occupants. It’s quiet for everyone. So quiet that after just 30 miles on the M4 I made a mental note to make sure that when I take control of No 10 those tyres become compulsory for all cars. They’re brilliant.

And so, for exactly the same reason, is the 6.75-litre V8 engine in this automotive leviathan. Amazingly, it was designed before I was born. And, on paper, you can tell. Words such as “single camshaft” and “pushrod” are from a time of rationing and diphtheria.

Eighteen years ago, when Volkswagen took control of Bentley, it said this venerable old V8 would have to be discontinued in the near future because it simply couldn’t be tuned to meet various emission regulations. But it was wrong.

It has fitted a couple of Mitsubishi turbochargers to provide forced induction and added a system that shuts down half the cylinders when they’re not needed to save fuel. And you’d imagine that all this tweakery would cause it to become feeble and weak. But it doesn’t.

The numbers are incredible: you get 530 brake horsepower and, at just 1750rpm, a truly colossal 811 torques. There are bulldozers with less than that — 811 lb ft is planetary force. It’s hysterical force. And you’d imagine that its creation would cause an almighty din. But astonishingly it doesn’t.

If you really stab the throttle deep into the inch-thick carpet, there is a barely discernible hum. But at all other times it’s as silent as a sleeping nun.

“Motorbikes? When I come to power, the banishment of these hideous and ugly machines from the roads will be near the top of my ‘to do’ list”

So this is a quiet car. And no matter what setting you choose for the air suspension, it’s a comfortable car too. It’s also good-looking. The aggressive new front end is especially impressive.

And it is extremely well equipped with all manner of things that you didn’t even know were possible. The rear touchscreens, for instance, rise silently from the back of the front seats. And then there’s the 2,200-watt stereo. That’s not a misprint. The manufacturer has fitted this completely silent car with a sound system that could blow your head clean off.

However, it’s precisely because of all this equipment and all these toys that I would buy a Rolls-Royce Ghost instead.

Someone at Bentley obviously believes that luxury can be measured in the number of buttons. They think that a house is palatial if you can run a bath from the garage and open the front gate using your television remote. And that is probably true — if you are a footballer. But I’m not.

I have criticised Bentleys in the past for being a bit “last week” when it comes to electronics. The Continental GT Speed, for example, doesn’t have a USB port, and that, in this day and age, is obviously nuts.

The problem is that with the Mulsanne Speed, Bentley’s gone berserk. So you now have two satellite navigation screens in the front that can be operated from the dash or the steering wheel or by touching the screen itself or by using your voice.

Eventually, I’m sure, you could machete your way through the operational complexity that results, but I suspect it would take many years.

Happily, there is a USB port. But it’s in a little drawer that can’t be shut if you’re using it. Then there’s the charging point, under the central armrest, which also can’t be shut if it’s in use.

You get the sense that asking Bentley to fit modern-day electronics is a bit like asking David Linley to reprogram your iPhone. Or Bill Gates to make a chest of drawers.

The result is daunting. You sit there, behind the wheel, confronted by hundreds and hundreds of buttons and switches, and you can’t help thinking how much better this car would be if only it were less complicated.

And maybe a tiny bit smaller. On the A40 in west London, where there are narrow lanes to “protect the workforce” — that’s never there — I was recently unable to pass a coach for miles. Which was a bore.


Browse NEW or USED cars for sale on driving.co.uk


It’s annoying. I like the idea of a Bentley more than the idea of a Rolls-Royce. My grandfather had a Bentley R Type, and it was the first car I drove. I like the idea, too, of telling people I drive an “MFB”.

But I never once drove this car as a Bentley could and should be driven. I never felt obliged to put the suspension in its Sport setting and unleash all those torques. I just wafted about in it. And if I want a large and luxurious car in which to waft, I’d rather have the simpler, airier, more tasteful Ghost.

Because when you sink into one of those, you say: “Aaaah.” Whereas when you sink into the Mulsanne Speed, you think: “Oh, for God’s sake. Where’s the button that shuts the bloody sat nav woman up?”


Write to us at
driving@sunday-times.co.uk, or Driving, The Sunday Times, 1 London Bridge Street, London SE1 9GF

The post The Clarkson Review: 2016 Bentley Mulsanne Speed appeared first on Sunday Times Driving.



source http://www.driving.co.uk/car-reviews/clarkson/clarkson-review-2016-bentley-mulsanne-speed/

Friday 25 November 2016

First Drive review: 2016 Fiat Tipo Hatchback

GIVEN the spectacularly powerful grip that the Fiat 500 has on our imaginations and on our roads — and given how there are certain parts of southern England, in particular, where not owning one appears to be against the law — there are probably some people who will be surprised to discover that Fiat still bothers to build any other cars. It does, though, and here to prove it is a new Tipo.

If the name sounds familiar, it’s because a hatchback called the Tipo appeared in 1988. Having largely failed to distract a world transfixed by the Volkswagen Golf, however, it was replaced in 1995 by the combined forces of the Fiat Bravo and the Fiat Brava, an unhelpfully named double act that, a bit like Ant and Dec, people sometimes struggled to tell apart. Was the Bravo the funny one, and the Brava the straight one, or was it the other way around? Was the Brava the one with three doors, or was that the Bravo?

It ended up not mattering very much either way when both of them were swept aside in 2001 by the Fiat Stilo, which spent six years trying and narrowly failing to look like a VW Polo before Fiat gave up on attempting to produce a mass-market, low-end hatchback altogether and fell to dreaming up a comeback for the 500 instead.


View the Fiat Tipos for sale on driving.co.uk


The company is back at it, though, reviving the Tipo name, pinning a courageously low price tag to it (the entry-level model costs £12,995) and hoping to come between you and the purchase of a Kia Cee’d, a Nissan Pulsar, a Hyundai i30 or a Ford Focus or any one of a fairly thick catalogue of largely indistinguishable products in this segment.

The car is built on the platform that yields the 500L, the inflated version of the city car, and if you can catch a savoury whiff of old-school Italian engineering here, you’ll be doing well because it’s built in Turkey.

Also, frankly, it looks pretty German. There’s a brooding lower lip, some chrome flashing and a fetchingly styled grille below its sculpted bonnet, in which you might just about be able to make out the strains of something more Mediterranean, but the overall shape seems designed to exude the capable pragmatism that makes VW products in this area so dominant.

“If you can catch a savoury whiff of old-school Italian engineering here, you’ll be doing well because it’s built in Turkey. Also, frankly, it looks pretty German”

That said, it goes to a lot of trouble not to betray its own cheapness. Here are properly weighty doors, opened using properly chunky, silvered door handles which, if anything, are so determined to convince you of the serious and well-funded craftsmanship that underpins them that they become slightly stiff and uncomfortable to operate.

Inside, low-grade plastics and low-grade fabrics make a valiant attempt to seem less so, and almost succeed. And on the one hand, the generous provision of a DAB radio means you need never be without BBC 6 Music as you travel.

But on the other hand, you can’t do any better than a squinty 5in info screen, which these days feels like a portable television in a world of wall-hung plasma, and which, as a sat-nav provider, is like trying to read the map on someone else’s phone from the other side of the room.

Ours had a somewhat wrist-intensive six-speed gearbox and a 1.6-litre diesel engine, which lifted the car effortlessly to cruising speed on the A12, albeit amid quantities of clatter and road thrum that were so retro, they almost induced nostalgia for the Tipo of the 1980s.


Browse NEW or USED cars for sale on driving.co.uk


The steering was also pretty muzzy, although, at these prices, the fact that the car comes with a steering wheel at all, let alone a rather nice, soft-touch one, ought probably to be a cause for humbled gratitude.

For all the clever budgetary shortcuts, though, and the fact that it’s a pleasant enough place to spend some time, the car does have that slight air of automotive wallpaper about it. We’re not saying the Tipo is completely unmemorable, but we did find, in the course of a few days spent in its company, and while running a few everyday errands in it, that having parked it in the car-lined side streets of south London, we were slightly struggling to relocate it as little as 90 minutes later. Maybe you could keep a reference image on your phone for emergencies such as these.

In fairness, though, we always did find it. Eventually. And we were always relieved to realise that we hadn’t lost it. Which has got to be some kind of a good sign, hasn’t it?

The post First Drive review: 2016 Fiat Tipo Hatchback appeared first on Sunday Times Driving.



source http://www.driving.co.uk/car-reviews/first-drive/first-drive-review-2016-fiat-tipo-hatchback/

Tuesday 22 November 2016

First Drive review: 2017 Skoda Kodiaq

IF YOU own a Smeg fridge, Roberts radio or Gaggia coffee maker, the chances are the new Skoda Kodiaq isn’t for you. This is a seven-seat SUV for those who shun paying top dollar prices for things when, as they keep telling their other half, alternatives cost half as much and work just as well.

It’s for people who pride themselves on seeing through the glossy veneer and carefully crafted messaging of posh brands. And when it comes to cars, that means names like Audi, BMW and Mercedes.

If you were to walk into any of their expansive glass showrooms and ask a sales person what seven-seat SUV they’ve got for around £24,000, they’d walk you straight back outside, to the selection of second hand cars on the forecourt. The most affordable new Audi Q7, is nearly £48,500.


Browse NEW or USED cars for sale on driving.co.uk


At first glance, then, the Kodiaq appears to be the answer to the prayers of countless middle class mums and dads who might be feeling the squeeze, both when it comes to fitting the family in the current car and managing the monthly household budget.

But the clever trick is that it won’t make the neighbours think “The Jones’ have been rummaging through the bargain bin again” when they see it parked outside your house.

If you glued an Audi or Volkswagen badge on the grille, nobody would spot the imposter. There are sharp creases down the flanks, narrow LED headlights that sweep up into the wings and chunky alloy wheels, all of which give the Kodiaq a healthy helping of presence. Yet it’s shorter than a Skoda Superb estate. So parking isn’t the chore you may have expected.

Under the bonnet, there will be a choice of two 1.4-litre petrol engines, with 123bhp and 148bhp respectively, and a 2-litre with 178bhp. Included in the range is a choice of a manual or automatic gearbox and two- or four-wheel drive.

If you glued an Audi or Volkswagen badge on the grille, nobody would spot the imposter

The Volkswagen Group’s 2-litre TDI engine continues to shrug off the controversy over the Dieselgate emissions scandal, and is pressed into service with the Kodiaq. It comes in 113bhp, 148bhp or 188bhp tune, and all but the weedy version come with a choice of two- or four-wheel drive and a manual or automatic gearbox.

The answer to the most obvious question is the 1.4 TSI (123bhp) SE; that being the most affordable model with seven seats, at £23,945. However, load one of those up with people and luggage and it’s likely to wheeze away like Jeremy Clarkson having a go at the parent’s race at school sports day.

The model most buyers are likely to pick is the 2-litre TDI. We tested the 148bhp version, with a manual gearbox, four-wheel drive and seven seats, and for all those badge snobs out there, here’s the bad news: it rarely put a foot wrong.

Yes, there’s a little bit of telltale diesel rattle from the engine when the car’s idling standstill, and no, it won’t rev to 9,000rpm, like a Ferrari. But what it will do is haul eagerly from almost tickover speeds, settle down to an unobtrusive thrum on the motorway and go easy on the fuel bills – with around 52.3mpg achievable.

First Drive review: 2017 Skoda Kodiaq

It’s even possible, when nobody else is aboard or, more likely, when coming perilously close to missing that cross channel ferry for the half term family holiday, to put your foot down and marvel at the way this big car (1,751kg) refuses to get flustered when driven with anything approaching gusto.

At speed, there is an underlying eagerness to respond and stay composed which suggests that the engineers did their best to make the Kodiaq feel, if not exciting, then at least reassuring.

If ever a seven-seat family car needed to play a trump card, it’s for the cabin. The Kodiaq aces it. There’s a thoroughly smart, if unimaginative, dashboard, with most of the touchscreen, connectivity creature comforts that I’d enjoyed only moments earlier in an Audi A4 allroad.

Challenge the back seats to the demands of three children and it won’t hold its hands up and plead for mercy. There are Isofix child seat mounts; the seat backs can tilt, to help passengers get more comfortable; and sliding them forward to gain access to the third row of seats is a simple, single-action movement.

Those rearmost seats are best suited to children, but adults won’t be complaining, especially if you’re giving them a lift home from a dinner party. When not needed, they can be folded into the floor – the seats, not your hitchhiking dinner companions – and that leaves what is best described as a black hole.

The boot offers 720-litres of luggage space – more acreage than the typical front garden of a suburban home – which can be extended to 2,065 litres with the back seats folded down. You’d need to drive a van to get more space than that.

There are other cars that attempt to perform the same party trick as the Kodiaq. The Kia Sorento, Hyundai Santa Fe and Nissan X-Trail, to name a few. But the Kodiaq manages to feel a cut above the other SUVs that are trying to undercut the Audis and BMWs of this world.

It’s the rational choice for people who like nothing better than doing the sensible thing. And who knows… with the savings, perhaps you could splash out on that Smeg fridge and Roberts radio?

The post First Drive review: 2017 Skoda Kodiaq appeared first on Sunday Times Driving.



source http://www.driving.co.uk/car-reviews/first-drive-review-2017-skoda-kodiaq/

Review: 2016 Audi A4 allroad quattro

DO YOU shudder at the sight of the packs of SUVs that prowl the roads during the school run hours? Perhaps you’ve caught yourself muttering something about other drivers’ insecurities? Or pondered how on earth anyone affords the fuel bills of a gas-guzzling Chelsea tractor? And let’s not get started on the polluting emissions…

If any of this sounds familiar, Audi would like a moment of your time. Years before the thought of building an SUV had entered its engineers’ heads, the German car maker took a regular A6 estate, raised the ground clearance, fitted chunky tyres and four-wheel drive and finished the bodywork off with a touch of plastic armour: the result was the A6 allroad.

It was, and remains, an estate car with just the right amount of go-anywhere hardware for drivers who didn’t always stick to the road.


View the used Audi A4 allroads for sale on driving.co.uk


So, whether you lived on a farm, spent the weekends towing horseboxes, or were simply fed up with struggling through the worst of the winter weather, the A6 allroad was the family car that drivers could count on.

Ten years later, a smaller sibling joined the family – the A4 allroad, in 2009. This is the second generation model, launched earlier in the year and based on the latest A4, a car that Jeremy Clarkson described as being so hard to fault that it is “as hard, really, as niggling about your Pizza Express American Hot.”

Both little and large allroads are an antidote to big, brash SUVs. For example, the A4 allroad range is priced from £36,010. That bags drivers a 2.0 TDI with 187bhp, a seven-speed automatic gearbox, quattro four-wheel drive and the potential to see 57mpg on the trip computer.

If you like a couple more cylinders under the bonnet, then a 3-litre V6 TDI with 215bhp costs from £37,860, and a 266bhp version is £39,630.

For those who would prefer to give diesel power a wide berth, the 2.0 TFSI petrol version, with 249bhp and tested here, is £37,725. These prices mean the adventure-ready estate is only an option or two cheaper than the latest, 2016 Q5.

The petrol model comes with what Audi calls ‘quattro on-demand’. Effectively, this means it will default to two-wheel drive until the split second wheelspin is detected, diverting power from the front to the back wheels. It’s to help improve fuel consumption, says Audi, and will be introduced to the diesel A4 allroads in due course.

Does it work? Well, the four-wheel drive system is responsive enough to never let the driver detect when it’s been in two-wheel drive mode – such as flooring the throttle out of a junction, or powering out of a hairpin. So when you need the security of having all four wheels delivering the power to the road, it’s there.

As for the fuel consumption, it averaged 40mpg during our time with the car, although that was mostly being driven on main roads. Nonetheless, it’s impressive, given the claimed combined figure is 44mpg.

Compared with a regular A4 Avant with quattro, the allroad version stands a little taller, by 34mm, meaning it should be that bit more accomplished when venturing off the beaten track.

It can also adapt its driving behaviour according to the Audi Drive Select system. A new feature is an ‘Offroad’ setting, which primes the car’s controls and four-wheel drive for more challenging terrain.

Two options likely to catch the attention of many A4 allroad buyers are the ‘allroad suspension with damping control’ and a ‘trailer pack’. The former costs £900 and lets the car, or the driver, vary the dampers between soft and comfortable or firm and sporty. The latter is £1,150, and includes an electrically operated tow bar and automated reversing system that steers for the driver; we’ll know if it works because we won’t see Audi drivers hanging their heads out of the window and cursing under their breath as they strain to get a better look while reversing.

Review: 2016 Audi A4 allroad quattro

The allroad’s ride comfort is a high point. Broken road surfaces are smoothed out, yet it doesn’t wallow about the place at speed. And the steering and handling are reassuringly secure, if not in the slightest bit exciting.

Perhaps the car’s strongest point, though, is just how quiet it is. The four-cylinder petrol engine is generally unheard, with just a crisp rasp at the top of its rev range, and at main road speeds there’s precious little noise from the wind or the tyres. Add in to the mix a responsive, seven-speed automatic gearbox and this is a seriously comfortable machine for long distance runs.

It’s quick, too. The sprint from 0-62mph takes just 6.1 seconds, but generally you drive the car in a relaxed fashion rather than indulging in such boy racer shenanigans.

The boot isn’t the biggest, but at 505-litres with the back seats in place, there’s enough room for a week’s worth of luggage and the Labrador

The rest of the car is largely the same as a regular A4 Avant. That means the interior appears to be exquisitely made, the front and back seats are comfortable and there’s enough room for a family of five.

The boot isn’t the biggest, but at 505-litres with the back seats in place, and 1,510 with them folded, there’s enough room for a week’s worth of luggage and the Labrador. And it comes with one-touch seat-folding buttons, a powered tailgate and an electrically operated luggage cover with integrated dividing net.

If an SUV isn’t to your liking, but you want a degree of capability for great escapes, the A4 allroad makes a strong case for itself.

It looks as athletic as a pair of Nike cross-country running shoes and, importantly, can deliver on its promises. A regular A4 Avant with quattro is better value for money, but allroad models tend to hold their value better, potentially making them a shrewd purchase.

The post Review: 2016 Audi A4 allroad quattro appeared first on Sunday Times Driving.



source http://www.driving.co.uk/car-reviews/review-2016-audi-a4-allroad-quattro/

Thursday 10 November 2016

The Clarkson Review: 2016 Volkswagen Golf GTI Clubsport Edition 40

MY TELEVISION colleagues and I had to visit Whitby recently, which meant there was a debate in the office about how we’d get to North Yorkshire. If we chose something comfortable and quiet, to deal with the massively over-policed M1, it’d be no fun at all once we got past Malton and said: “Have some of that.”

Whereas if we chose something that would be fun on that truly glorious road over Fylingdales Moor, it’d be a chore in the stop-start hell that is the M1.

In the end we decided to cheat and use a train from London to York, which is more expensive than going on a golden elephant but takes about three minutes these days. And then we’d use a car for the final leg.


View the VW Golfs for sale on driving.co.uk


But what car? The temptation, obviously, was to select something idiotic — a Lamborghini Aventador, perhaps, or the new and really rather beautiful Ferrari GTC4Lusso. But the truth is, show-off cars such as those are designed to work, mostly, in cities.

So quite quickly all three of us decided that hot hatchbacks would be perfect for the job. And this caused another debate. There’s no doubt at all that the best of the bunch is the little Ford Fiesta ST. But I’d driven that, and anyway it was shotgunned immediately by Mr Hammond.

And before I could draw breath to say, “Well, I’ll have a Ford Focus RS, then”, James May put down his pipe, adjusted his slippers and shotgunned that. So I had a good long think and remembered that Volkswagen had recently smashed the front-wheel-drive lap record at the Nürburgring with a car called the Golf GTI Clubsport S.

In essence it’s a GTI, but, thanks to a lot of electrical jiggery-pokery under the bonnet, it produces a colossal 306bhp. And there’s more. The ride has been made priapic. The body shell has been stiffened. The back seats and the parcel shelf and various bits of carpet have been removed. And as a result it’s hard and tight and light and, as we saw when it broke that lap record, very, very fast.

This is exactly the sort of car that would be terrible to live with day to day but perfect for an afternoon assault on the North York Moors. I was very happy with my choice until I received word that the Clubsport S is a limited-edition special, and that none was available.

Instead I ended up with a car built to celebrate the GTI’s 40th birthday. Called the Clubsport Edition 40, it looks like a Clubsport S but it has carpets and back seats and all the luxuries you’d expect. You can even have it with four doors, which is a very un-Clubsporty thing.

“I was far behind Hammond in his little Fiesta, but it’s always possible to catch May. Even if you’re on a mule with a hurty leg”

All of which means it’s a GTI with some spoilers and a small amount of electrical jiggery- pokery under the bonnet. And that in turn means it’s nothing more than a slightly pricier version of a car I already own.

It did have a nicer steering wheel — I’ll admit that. And lovely seats. But it had a manual gearbox, which was a nuisance in York, where the traffic lights are red for about six years and then flash green in the same way as the sun does when it sinks into the sea. It took longer to get out of the city than it had taken to get there from London.

By the time I finally found the A64 to Pickering and the glory of the moors, I was far behind Hammond in his little Fiesta, but it’s always possible to catch May. Even if you’re on a mule with a hurty leg.

So off I set, and straight away I could tell the Clubsport Edition 40 is more than VW’s present to itself. The figures suggest it has only 35 more brake horsepower than the standard GTI, but if your right foot comes into contact with the firewall, there’s an overboost facility that gives you 286bhp. This makes the front wheels spin, which makes the traction control go into busybody mode. Which means that if you want this sort of power for this sort of money, you’re better off with the all-wheel-drive Golf R.

However. And it’s a big however. In my standard GTI — chosen because I can’t be bothered to explain to people at parties what an R is — there’s a definite hole in the power delivery. When you just want to go slightly faster, you put your foot down a bit and … nothing happens.

It’s almost certainly some kind of ludicrous emission program in the engine control unit, but it feels like turbo lag and it’s annoying. However, in the Clubsport Edition 40 it doesn’t happen. The movement of your foot is translated instantly into a change of pace. It makes the whole car feel more alert and alive.

I’d love to tell you that the chassis is crisper too, because it probably is. But the truth is that this car feels exactly the same as the standard GTI. Which means it is extremely clever at riding the bumps and then gripping as if it’s on spikes in the corners.

VW even says that the bigger rear spoiler and the splitter at the front create actual downforce once you’re going above 75mph. So in order to not crash, you just need to speed up.

Hammond will tell you — and he’s right — the Fiesta ST is more fun, and May will tell you that the Focus RS is better in extremis. But as a blend of all you need, the VW is in a class of its own.


Browse NEW or USED cars for sale on driving.co.uk


It’s the same story with the interior. Everything has a top-quality feel that you just don’t get in the two Fords, plus there’s a lot of standard equipment provided as standard.

Of course it’s not as good as the Golf R. That’s a remarkable car. A brilliant car. But if you want a GTI because, well, you want a GTI, this Clubsport Edition 40 makes a deal of sense. It’s my own car, with a couple of neat styling touches and the performance hole caused by bureaucrats in Brussels filled in.

Richard disagreed with this. And so did James when he finally arrived at the hotel. And we argued about that into the night. It’s good to be back.

 

CONTACT US Comment below, write to us at driving@sunday-times.co.uk, or Driving, The Sunday Times, 1 London Bridge Street, London SE1 9GF

The post The Clarkson Review: 2016 Volkswagen Golf GTI Clubsport Edition 40 appeared first on Sunday Times Driving.



source http://www.driving.co.uk/car-reviews/clarkson/clarkson-review-2016-volkswagen-golf-gti-clubsport-edition-40/

Tuesday 8 November 2016

First Drive review: 2016 Tesla Model S 60D

Tesla Model S 60D review by Giles Smith for Sunday Times Driving

IT WAS while I was Autopiloting up the M4, just west of Heathrow, that the conclusion became inescapable. The Tesla Model S 60D is quite simply the greatest car your correspondent has ever not driven.

That Autopilot feature takes a small amount of getting used to, though. The first time you flick the indicator and then trust the car, at 70mph in thickening traffic, with no input from you on either steering wheel or pedals, to make its own way into the adjacent lane… well, that moment calls for a fairly profound leap of faith, not to mention an ability to block out recent news stories regarding unfortunate incidents on American freeways.

Think of it only as a superior kind of cruise control, Tesla insists, with its lawyers hovering anxiously in the background. (Last month it announced a hardware upgrade to all its new cars that makes them ready for fully autonomous driving.) Yes, the car uses radar to sweep the area for road markings and moving objects but that doesn’t mean there is to be any climbing into the back with a copy of Puzzler and a packet of Jelly Babies. Hands must remain on the wheel at all times.


View the Tesla Model S cars for sale on driving.co.uk


Which mine duly did — perhaps a little too firmly at first. My twitchiness and eagerness to get involved, as heavily laden lorries lurched up ahead, repeatedly disengaged the system and put me back in control. But my hands relaxed eventually, followed by my shoulders, which descended from the position they had taken up adjacent to my ears. And soon I was sitting back and letting the car take the strain.

The 60D is one of six variants of Tesla’s large saloon, which suggests the tech entrepreneur Elon Musk with his PayPal billions is serious in his attempt to take luxury electric cars into the mainstream. It manages to look distinctive but unpretentious. It doesn’t fall into the electric-car trap of trying to make a statement about tomorrow with its bodywork. It is content to look like anybody else’s car, provided that car is a nice, expensive one.

And, oh, the joy of operating it, at every level. “Is that a key in your pocket?” the car will murmur to itself as you approach, before delivering the lavishly thick silver door handles from their flush position in the bodywork. Naturally, I was overcome by a childish urge to catch the system napping. I tried jumping out, creeping up, rushing it from behind. Nothing worked. The handles were always ready.

“There is no vehicle on the road so extensively and intuitively keyed into the sensibilities of a generation reared on tablets and phones”

Blissfully, the dashboard has been cleared of all but two buttons — one to unlatch the glove compartment; one for the hazard lights. All other controls reside on a giant touchscreen. Key items — the air-conditioning; the windscreen demister — are a single tap away. Slightly more recherché things — the weight of the steering wheel; the degree of the regenerative braking; Spotify, which comes as standard — are a maximum of three taps away.

The car rushes through the air in eye-widening surges of power, yet without engine noise, exhaust burble, petrol whiff or any of that other prog rock stuff.

You can expect to get a little over 250 miles out of its fully charged battery, which is enough to banish range anxiety, at least in the short term. Most versions of the Model S will take you even further. Program a journey beyond the car’s range and the sat nav will inform you where you need to stop for electricity — assuming the proposed charging point isn’t occupied when you reach it.

2016 Tesla Model S P90D review

As for infrastructure, the on-screen map of British charging stations — both Tesla’s own, and secondary public points that will also do the job but slightly slower — looks encouragingly forested. That said, each tab representing a charger is roughly the size of Birmingham, scale-wise, so the sense of a bristling network may be a graphic illusion as much as anything else. Still, the network is there and — we’re promised — expanding.


Browse NEW or USED cars for sale on driving.co.uk


And what a car. For all the industry-wide blather about “connectivity”, there is no vehicle on the road so extensively and intuitively keyed into the sensibilities of a generation reared on tablets and phones.

And yet there’s something fundamentally warm about it, too. Your relationship with a car alters when that car seems to have a brain. One could imagine growing fond of a Tesla in the way one might grow fond of a dog.

A Model S is more expensive than a dog, of course. Entry-level here (the S 60) still means a cool £57,780, minimum. But is that so much to stump up for a living slice of the future? And maybe Tesla accepts PayPal.

The post First Drive review: 2016 Tesla Model S 60D appeared first on Sunday Times Driving.



source http://www.driving.co.uk/car-reviews/first-drive/first-drive-review-2016-tesla-model-s-60d/