Tuesday 11 December 2018

Flex Buffer

Flex Buffer – The Best Buffer for Auto Detailing and Paint Correction

 

Meguiars FLEX 3401 Ultra Polish Kit with 6.5 Inch Pads

 

  • FLEX XC 3401 VRG Orbital Variable Speed Polisher
  • 32 oz. Meguiars Mirror Glaze #105 Ultra-Cut Compound
  • 32 oz. Meguiars Mirror Glaze #205 Ultra Finishing Polish
  • 3 CCS Orange Light Cutting 6.5 inch Foam Pads
  • 2 CCS Gray Finishing 6.5 Inch Foam Pads, 2 Cobra Microfiber Detailing Cloths, 16 x 16 inches

The Meguiars FLEX 3401 Ultra Polish Kit with 6.5 Inch Pads wins the battle against swirls every time. This kit has the micro abrasive polishing action of Meguiar’s #105 and #205 plus the true orbital motion of the FLEX XC 3401 Polisher. When it comes to swirl and scratch removal, the Meguiars FLEX 3401 Ultra Polish Kit with 6.5 Inch Pads is your best ally. Use Meguiars Mirror Glaze #105 Ultra-Cut Compound first. Work at a maximum speed of 5-6 on the FLEX XC 3401 VRG Polisher with an included light cutting pad. Work until the compound starts to dry. Wipe off the residue with a clean Cobra Microfiber Detailing Cloth. Follow up with Meguiars Mirror Glaze #205. Using a dual action polisher and a gray finishing pad, work at a speed of 4 or 5. Work in a 2 x 2 sq. ft. area and wipe off polish immediately after polishing using a clean Cobra Microfiber Detailing Cloth.

//ws-na.amazon-adsystem.com/widgets/q?ServiceVersion=20070822&OneJS=1&Operation=GetAdHtml&MarketPlace=US&source=ac&ref=qf_sp_asin_til&ad_type=product_link&tracking_id=sbmaz-20&marketplace=amazon&region=US&placement=B002FAOB1W&asins=B002FAOB1W&linkId=2cb8aab5fcad6c27965d9fc3c0ef0de9&show_border=true&link_opens_in_new_window=true&price_color=333333&title_color=0066c0&bg_color=ffffff
Questions and Answers:

Answer:
Hello, Mr. Liu. The backing plate is already on the polisher in the box.
By Palm Beach Motoring Accessorie… Seller on October 4, 2013
comes with a plate for std hook and loop pads
By gary s. bernstein on October 6, 2013

 

featureBoxVar = “”;
Source: https://cardetailingphoenix.com/index.php/2018/12/11/flex-buffer/



source https://cardetailingphx.wordpress.com/2018/12/12/flex-buffer/

2019 Kia e-Niro review

WHAT HAVE we here? A £30,000-ish pure-electric SUV that has a range of nearly 300 miles and comes with Kia’s famous seven-year warranty, providing peace of mind about the technology? If you’ve been considering electric car ownership but have been put off by worries over battery range or Tesla’s sky-high prices, the Kia e-Niro is shaping up to be the car that finally wins you round.

True, it’s not the most stylish of SUVs out there — you can pick up an uber-cool XC40 for the the same money — but it’s also far from ugly. The e-Niro marks itself out from the standard Niro hybrid thanks to a solid front grille, which houses the charging port, and flashes of blue trim near the daytime running lights and round the air intakes. The e-Niro also has differently styled alloy wheels which, like the grille, aid aerodynamics and efficiency.

Similarly, the interior is comfortable and practical rather than exciting and stylish. The tone is set by the slick 8in touchscreen that comes with sat-nav, a JBL stereo, reversing camera, and compatibility with Apple Carplay and Android Auto. It’s easy enough to use, and there’s the back-up of the row of buttons below the screen to help navigate the system while you’re driving.

Elsewhere, there’s a lot of black in the cabin but the blue flashes around the air vents and mood lighting system for the centre console help lift the ambience. And all those black bits are quite nice anyway, with leather, soft-touch plastics and piano black trim.

Front passengers will be comfortable enough; the driver’s seat comes with 8-way power adjustment and lumbar support. But adults in the back don’t fare so well; head and shoulder room is OK, but a small hump in the floor and not much space for your feet make you feel a little cramped.

The boot is a decent size, though: the car’s batteries are underneath rather than between the rear wheels, so the e-Niro’s boot is about the same size as that of the Nissan Qashqai.

The Kia e-Niro is a bit more practical than a Nissan Leaf, but it’s also more expensive

And the e-Niro is a lot of fun to drive. With instant acceleration, you’ll zip sharply off from the lights and out of junctions. It is comfortable and, of course, there’s no noise beyond what comes from the tyres and airflow, thanks to that electric drivetrain.

The car has three drive modes that you can alternate between via a dial on the centre console – eco, normal and sport. Keep the car in eco mode and you can expect the range to increase. Switch to sport and the e-Niro feels much sportier to drive, but the range will drop.

Of course, charging takes a long time. If your e-Niro is completely out of battery it can take nearly 10 hours to completely recharge at home. But then again, if you’re at home and it’s sitting on your driveway doing nothing, it might as well be topping up.

The Kia will also take a much faster 100kW rapid charge, enabling the battery to get back up to 80% full in 54 minutes. Unfortunately, at the time of writing you’ll struggle to find a 100kW charger in the UK. More likely you’ll be able to plug in to a 50kW public charger, which will should be able to get you from zero to 80% in 75 minutes.

Rapid charging isn’t terribly kind to the batteries but, as mentioned earlier, at the time of writing Kia says the battery is covered by the same standard seven-year/100,000 mile warranty applies as the rest of the car. We wouldn’t leave it without charge for a long time, though, as that tends to kill the battery (it’s called bricking); we’ll wager mistreating it like that will appear as a caveat in the warranty terms and conditions when the e-Niro goes on sale.

Kia has been generous with standard equipment but, although it’s good value compared to a Tesla or Jaguar I-Pace, at a whisker below £33,000 it’s similarly priced to the forthcoming Tesla Model 3 and more expensive than the Hyundai Kona EV and Nissan Leaf, albeit a bit more practical. For that kind of money, many buyers may prefer a fairly posh petrol or diesel SUV. Then again, there are potentially some serious fuel savings to be had.

Having weighed up the pros and cons, you may be sorely tempted. The problem is that you’ll have to wait until April 1 next year before you can put your order in. On the plus side, that does give you plenty more time to think things over.

Find out how much you could save on the Kia e-Niro at carwow (not on sale at time of publishing)

 

Kia e-Niro rivals

Hyundai Kona Electric
£29,495 — £36,295
See how much you could save at carwow

Nissan Leaf
£29,690 — £32,890
See how much you could save at carwow

Jaguar I-Pace
£64,495 — £81,495
See how much you could save at carwow

The post 2019 Kia e-Niro review appeared first on Sunday Times Driving.



source https://www.driving.co.uk/car-reviews/first-drive/2019-kia-e-niro-review/

Monday 10 December 2018

2019 Renault Kadjar review

IT’S ALWAYS fun when I meet a Kadjar owner. “What car do you own?”

“A Kadjar.”

“Bless you.”

But the success of Renault’s mid-size SUV is no joke — 450,000 have been sold worldwide since it launched in 2015, and now here comes the refreshed version with a heap of decent styling, trim and engine updates that should keep the ball rolling.

The Kadjar was never the most striking of cars to look at — its design could be described as “generic crossover” — but it’s not ugly by any stretch, and the new model brings some extra aesthetic appeal, with a wider front grille, LED running lights and front fog lights on every model, new rear light clusters and bumper, and three new paint colours to choose from. Iron Blue is a particularly interesting one, given that iron generally isn’t blue.

The new Kadjar’s dimensions remain the same inside and out but the number of trim levels has been slimmed down, from five to four, starting with “Play” and moving up through “Iconic” and the new “S-Edition” to the range-topping GT Line.

Prices start at £20,595 for the entry-level Kadjar; a fraction more than the most basic Nissan Qashqai, which is exactly the same car underneath (although everything a customer can see or touch is unique to the Kadjar, Renault says). But the pricing is very reasonable given that the SEAT Ateca and Ford Kuga, two of the 40 major competitors, cost upwards of £21,880 and £22,910 respectively.

And don’t think Renault is skimping on kit, to keep costs down; the entry-level Kadjar Play is packed with 17-inch alloy wheels, tinted windows, automatic headlights, rain-sensing windscreen, rear parking sensors, cruise control, climate control and a more responsive 7in touchscreen as standard.

Renault said it listened to customer feedback, resulting in changes such as backlit window and mirror controls, with one-touch opening on all four windows and larger door bins to hold a 1.5-litre drinks bottle. The most noticeable change over the old Kadjar is to the air conditioning controls, with the new three-dial system being much smarter than the previous, more fussy arrangement.

Materials inside remain largely unchanged, though. That’s not a bad thing, with a mix of hard and soft-touch plastics, and leather brought into the mix on the top grade. The “3D effect” quilted fabric seats are comfortable and there’s plenty of space in the front, with decent room in the rear, too.

It’s odd that DAB digital radio is only available on Iconic spec-and-up Kadjars, but all models’ infotainment systems can run Apple Carplay and Android Auto, meaning even owners of the Kadjar Play can get BBC 6 Music, Virgin Radio and so on via their smartphone.

Carplay and Android integration also means that the built-in TomTom LIVE sat nav, which is also available from Iconic trim upwards, is immediately redundant, given apps like Google Maps and Waze do a superior job and will be more future-proof, arguably.

The £22,095 Iconic model looks more worthwhile when you consider that it adds 19in alloys, front parking sensors, reversing camera, keyless entry, roof bars, folding mirrors, and air vents and USB sockets for the rear passengers.

Go for the S-Edition (from £23,595) and you get full LED headlights, LED fog lights, chrome detailing on the skid plates, unique upholstery with blue stitching and a panoramic sunroof.

The top-spec GT Line (from £25,095) brings a full leather interior with heated front seats, 360-degree cameras, puddle lamps, hands-free parking and a blind-spot warning system.

Renault has revised the engine range this time around, with eight engine and transmission options. If you want petrol, there are 138bhp or 158bhp options, while the two brand new diesel motors come with 113bhp or 148bhp.

The smaller petrol and diesel can be mated to a seven-speed auto gearbox, while the larger engines come with a six-speed manual only, and the bigger diesel can be either two- or four-wheel drive. There’s no hybrid at this time, but Renault’s family car product planner told me they’re working with Nissan on electrified powertrains for the next Kadjar and Qashqai.

We drove both petrol motors and the larger diesel, and both ‘boxes. The petrols both proved quite diesel-like in their mannersFddo, with oodles of torque above around 1,700rpm. They also pull well over a wide power band, meaning low-speed manoeuvring is a doddle and overtaking is just as painless. They do sound a little gruff for petrol engines at low revs, though.

The six-speed manual transmission is so smooth it’s like the box is full of treacle, but it’s a long lever with a long throw, and is quite loose in the gate. The automatic shifts cogs quickly and generally picks the right one at the right time, but we slid the lever across to allow manual shifting through twisty sections of road, as acceleration out of corners can be a little hesitant if left to the computer.

Interestingly, fuel economy and emissions levels actually improve with the automatic transmission, according to the latest official tests. By choosing it over the manual you’re looking at 51.3mpg rather than 47.9mpg on the entry-level petrol Kadjar, and 131g/km instead of 134g/km of CO2. It’s the same story with the diesels, according to the figures published by Renault, so we’d got auto if buying one for ourselves.

Handling and ride quality are much the same as before, with body roll noticable when compared to a hatchback, though not excessive, and a decent feel through the wheel. Renault says they focused hard on comfort when it came to tuning the suspension, but our test cars proved to have a relatively firm ride, meaning bumps in the road (there were plenty of broken roads in Sardinia, making it quite a good indicator of what to expect in the UK) are transferred through the chassis. It’s not an uncomfortable ride by any means, but we’d seriously consider a model with 17in wheels over the 19s, if we were speccing our own Kadjar.

We also got a taste of the 148bhp diesel in 4×4 guise on a dedicated off-road course. Crossovers like the Kadjar aren’t true off-roaders but Renault were at pains to prove the Nissan-derived system can handle more than a gravel driveway during the car’s international launch.

It can be set to two-wheel drive, automatic four-wheel drive — whereby it detects loss of traction and diverts up to 50% of the torque to the rear wheels — or “Lock”, which gives you a permanent 50:50 front-rear split, up to 50kph (31mph).

2019 Renault Kadjar review by Will Dron for Sunday Times' Driving.co.uk - 4x4 cutaway

We stuck a manual Kadjar 4×4 in Lock mode and took it around a dedicated off-road course, which included deep mud ruts, moguls and 25-degree lean angles (the pics in the gallery are of this exact course), and it didn’t skip a beat.

Most impressively, the water splash— which was deep enough to bring a chill to the footwell — was shrugged off without breaking a sweat. The Kadjar can wade to a depth of 450mm, apparently.

I was genuinely shocked by its off-road prowess, especially given it was fitted with road tyres and the largest 19in alloys. A proper off-road enthusiast may be interested in details such as 200mm of ground clearance, an angle of attack of 17 degrees and an angle of departure of 25 degrees. Most of us just need to know that the 4×4 Kadjar is a surprisingly capable machine on the rough stuff.

Bad things? Well, the wind noise from the large wing mirrors is quite noticeable at speed, and Renault hasn’t managed to eradicate the irritating squeaks and rattles around the cabin. But overall the new Kadjar (gesundheit) is a more compelling proposition than ever, and still at a very competitive price.

 

Head to head

Renault Kadjar vs Seat Ateca

2019 Renault Kadjar GT Line TCe 140 EDC Auto 2019 SEAT Ateca SE Technology 1.5 TSI EVO DSG 150 PS
Price (OTR) £25,895 £26,730
Power 138bhp 148bhp
0-62mph 9.6sec 8.6sec
Top speed 126mph 123mph
Economy (official combined) 51.3mpg 49.6mpg
CO2 131g/km 129g/km
Boot space (seats up) 527 litres 510 litres
Dimensions (L x W x H) 4,489mm x 1,836mm x 1,613mm 4,363mm x 1,841mm x 1,615mm

The post 2019 Renault Kadjar review appeared first on Sunday Times Driving.



source https://www.driving.co.uk/car-reviews/first-drive/2019-renault-kadjar-review/

Friday 7 December 2018

2018 Ford EcoSport Mk 2 review

YOU KNOW those vertically-challenged men at the gym, with tiny legs but hulk-like biceps? That’s the Ford EcoSport.

Not because it’s lacking in the height department; far from it, in fact — this second-generation EcoSport is jacked up to the max, as one of those weight-lifting enthusiasts might say (but then again, might not). It has up to 19cm of ground clearance, an astounding wading depth of 550mm (the famously tiny-but-tough Suzuki Jimny 4×4 can only wade through 320mm of water) and towers a full 11cm over the Seat Arona, a class-leading rival.

But the EcoSport is stunted in the length department, being just a fraction longer than the Fiesta supermini on which it’s based. With those lofty and ford-crossing credentials but tiny footprint, on paper it has the potential to be a great car for town and country, offering a commanding view of the road in a package that’s easy to park.

But, with high sides and short wheelbase, you’d be forgiven for assuming it’s a bit of a dog’s dinner, both to drive and and aesthetically. Surprisingly, that’s way off the mark.

Let’s start with the way it looks. Yes, it does have odd proportions but the post-2014 EcoSport is by no means an ugly car, and the refreshed-for-2018 version is rather good-looking, especially in the ST-Line trim with optional 18in wheels and Tiger Eye (bright gold) paint, which is what was delivered to us for review.

It managed to pull off tough and stylish at the same time, helped in no small part by the fact that Ford dropped the much-maligned spare wheel on the rear tailgate when it launched the second-gen car.

The good news continues inside, with a greatly improved interior for 2018, with all versions getting an 8in touchscreen that helps free up clutter. The overall look of the dashboard is grown-up but stylish, with chrome accents here and there and leather trim on the steering wheel and handbrake. Overall build quality is a cut above most rivals, too — we’d go as far as to say Ford has reached VW levels in this regard.

“Ford’s deal with Bang & Olufsen means that you can have one of the finest sound systems on any car”

Standard tech levels are impressive, too. All cars get air conditioning, an air-conditioned glovebox, electric windows front and back, DAB radio and Ford’s SYNC smartphone connectivity, as well as the ability to run Android Auto / Apple Carplay via your phone, including navigation from Google, Waze and others. And Ford’s deal with Bang & Olufsen means that, if you go for a Titanium or ST-Line model and fork out the extra £350, you will have one of the finest sound systems on any car. Seriously.

The way it drives also impresses, with a good weight to the steering and keen handling, given its high-riding stance. We had the all-wheel drive version (only available with the 1.5-litre diesel engine), which proved grippy in damp, autumnal conditions with leaves littering the roads, but we thought better of giving it a serious off-road challenge — despite the wading credentials, the EcoSport isn’t really meant to be a hardcore 4×4.

But if you’re hoping for the sublime ride quality of the Fiesta, you’ll be disappointed; the reworked suspension is much firmer, to reduce body roll, which means the EcoSport has a harsher ride and is nowhere near as good at absorbing the bumps and potholes of Britain’s broken roads. It’s not terrible, though, and the larger alloys with “painted on” tyres fitted to our test car won’t have helped with shock absorption — we’d recommend going for the standard 16in wheels, or the ST-Line’s regular 17s.

Engine choice can make a big difference to tax and economy. There are three EcoBoost petrol engines, with power outputs of 100PS (99bhp), 125PS (123bhp) or 140PS (138bhp), and the 1.5-litre diesel with 100PS or 125PS.

We had the latter, which offers decent thrust and surprisingly free-revving refinement for an oil burner, but coupled to the 4×4 transmission and 18in wheels, the official fuel economy figure drops from 60.1mpg to 52.3mpg (actually, it was more like 44mpg for us, in the real world) and CO2 leaps from 123g/km to 140g/km — a rise only the tax man can love.

The sweet spot is probably the front-wheel-drive 125PS petrol, which promises over 50mpg and up to 125g/km of CO2. This engine is also the only one that can be mated to an automatic gearbox, but avoid that if possible as, again, economy and emissions suffer considerably.

Any real problems with EcoSport? Well, there’s the interior space; fine up front but don’t expect any more room in the rear seats than you’d find in a Fiesta.

The boot isn’t huge either, holding 356 litres of luggage up to the parcel shelf, but its square opening makes it a much more useful load lugger, especially when you fold down the rear seats to make use of the full 1,238 litres.

Getting things in and out isn’t always easy, though, because while the tailgate has lost the spare wheel from the first generation EcoSport, it still opens from the right side like a door, rather than up like a standard hatchback. That means that if you park with the rear of the car too close to a wall or another parked car, you can’t open it fully. It’s a bizarre bit of design that suggests Ford is more concerned with hanging on to a quirky sales gimmick than making life easier for customers.

You might be able to forgive the EcoSport its irritations, though, as there’s enough good stuff going on to make it worth a look for anyone in the market for a small crossover. It’s a tough and expanding market, and rivals like the Seat Arona and Volkswagen T-Roc are arguably all-round better propositions, but Ford has caught up with VW on style and quality. If you’re a Fiesta driver and want something almost as short but more hulking up top, this is a fine choice.

 

Head to head

Ford Ecosport vs Volkswagen T-Roc

2018 Ford EcoSport ST-Line 1.0 EcoBoost 125PS 2018 Volkswagen T-Roc Design 1.0 TSI 115 PS 6-speed manual
Price (OTR) £21,545 £21,320
0-62mph 11sec 10.1sec
Top speed 111mph 116mph
Economy (official combined) 53.3mpg 55.4mpg
CO2 119g/km 117g/km
Boot space (seats up, to tonneau) 356 litres 445 litres
Dimensions (L x W x H) 4,096mm x 1,765mm x 1,653mm 4,234mm x 1,819mm x 1,573mm

The post 2018 Ford EcoSport Mk 2 review appeared first on Sunday Times Driving.



source https://www.driving.co.uk/car-reviews/2018-ford-ecosport-mk-2-review/