Monday, 20 February 2017

Audi A5 coupé review (2017-on)

WHO DOESN’T like to feel good about themselves when they get dressed in the mornings? A sharp suit, striking shirt or designer blouse and killer heels can make us walk taller, figuratively and literally.

But there’s a limit. Can you picture yourself strolling into Starbucks, to order your morning cappuccino, wearing a Vivienne Westwood outfit? Of course not; you’d look like a clown on the run from the circus.

Which is why, when it comes to anything to do with style, most of us play it safe and stick to high street labels. We want to feel good about ourselves, rather than feel like a fashion victim with more money than sense.


View the used Audi A5s for sale on driving.co.uk


Car makers understand this. None more so than Audi. It has built a business out of selling high street style to drivers. The TT, the car of the noughties, put a skip in the step of hundreds of thousands of drivers who couldn’t care less how well it turned around corners; they just wanted to turn heads.

The TT’s big brother, the A5 coupé, has been taking much the same approach, since it was launched in 2007. It wraps designer-look clothes around a workaday chassis and sells at high street prices.

Now the second-generation A5 coupé is strutting its stuff in British showrooms. Prices start from £30,700, which pitches the four-seat model on the catwalk against the likes of the BMW 4-series and Mercedes C-class coupé.

There are four-cylinder petrol and diesel-powered versions, some of which can be ordered with quattro four-wheel drive, as well as a V6 diesel and, in the S5 flagship, a turbocharged V6 petrol – which raises the price to £47,000.

The model reviewed here is the 2.0 TFSI quattro S line S tronic. Costing £41,240, it’s the jalfrezi of the range, a hot-ish number with a four-cylinder petrol engine kicking out 249bhp to all four wheels, via a seven-speed, dual-clutch automatic gearbox. In other words, it’s the S5 Lite.

Audi A5 coupe review (2017-on)

It sure does look good, especially in S line trim and wearing the optional (£1,050) ‘multispoke V’ 19 inch alloy wheels. The designers seem to have exaggerated all the design cues of the last A5. In particular, the side panelling looks as though it’s been left in a giant trouser press overnight, with a prominent crease running from nose to tail.

Predictably, the interior leads the way in terms of perceived quality. Everything you can see and touch feels expensive, and the clarity and functionality is second to none. Much of the layout is lifted straight from the A4 saloon, on which the A5 is based, which is as good a starting point as you’re going to get in this price range.

It’s annoying that in a car with restricted visibility, a rear-view camera is a £450 option; prepare to twist your neck out of alignment

The transmission tunnel is quite wide, but the driving position is good and the sports seats, which initially feel firm and unforgiving, prove supremely comfortable over time. When tilted forward, they slide forward automatically and there’s even a seatbelt butler, in the form of an arm that passes the belt toward the driver’s shoulder – a trick which is cheekily pinched from Mercedes of years gone by.

What’s not so impressive is the back seat space. This is a big car – 4,673mm long and 1,846mm wide – but average height adults will have their knees jammed into the back of the driver’s seat. And for the benefit of the uninitiated, it’s worth highlighting there are only four seats.

Equally, it’s annoying that in a car with restricted visibility, a rear-view camera is a £450 option. Prepare to twist your neck out of alignment, unless you have blind faith in the parking sensors are standard. It’s also worth adding that the car has scored a maximum five star safety rating in the Euro NCAP crash tests.

The boot is surprisingly spacious, holding 465 litres – a Mercedes C-class coupé offers just 400 litres – and the seat backs can be lowered to free up more room still.

Audi A5 coupe review (2017-on)

So it looks good, inside and out. But what of the driving experience? Audi’s engineers have been attempting to put some emotion back into their cars, the A5 included.

That’s why you get sport suspension as standard, and can now order a ‘sport’ differential for the rear axle (£1,200) to complement the four-wheel drive. Drivers that want to soften things off, though, can pay £600 to change the S line to ‘Adaptive Comfort’ suspension, which means you can change it at the touch of a button to soften or stiffen the dampers.

Our car came with the standard S line set-up. It’s sure-footed along a winding road, generates a lot of grip through bends and there’s just enough power sent to the rear wheels to prevent the nose from washing out when pushed beyond the tyres’ limit of adhesion.

But if you want excitement, may we respectfully suggest you look elsewhere? A BMW 4-series, or even the Mercedes C-class coupé, do a better job of sending just enough of a shiver down your spine to make driving interesting.

The A5’s steering is lifeless, the turbocharged four-cylinder engine has been smothered under a mountain of sound-proofing material and the Drive Select system is one of those gimmicks that you’ll soon tire of. Even the dual clutch transmission can be caught dithering at times.

It’s a shame, because this is a deceptively quick car, with oodles of thrust from 1,500rpm and capable of getting from A to B no matter what the weather conditions without putting a foot wrong. But along the way, the driver is left feeling like a passenger.

What is does do fantastically well is make a long journey feel like a trip to the corner shop. Few coupés are as hushed and relaxing as this one. But we’d happily trade some of that calm for a bit more interaction between man and machine.

As if often the case with Audis, then, the A5 coupé is dressed to thrill. Unfortunately, while the clothes look great the person wearing them isn’t all that interesting.

The post Audi A5 coupé review (2017-on) appeared first on Sunday Times Driving.



source https://www.driving.co.uk/car-reviews/audi-a5-coupe-review-2017/

Tuesday, 14 February 2017

The Clarkson Review: 2017 Honda NSX

BACK IN the days when you could walk from Calais to Dover and wattle was a popular building material, Honda decided it would like to build a supercar with a V10 engine. It would, the company said, be a replacement for the old NSX, and I was very excited.

Every so often I’d call Honda to see how it was coming along, and it’d say, “Very well”, but that there’d been a bit of a delay because of the ice age, or the eruption of Krakatoa or some other geological disturbance. I seem to recall at one point it said it’d had to change the interior because modern man was a different shape from his Neanderthal predecessor.

And then there was a wobble in the Japanese economy, and the V10 engine lost its Formula One halo, so Honda announced that the new car would be some kind of hybrid with electric motors and a turbocharged V6. That sounded pretty exciting too, especially when Ferrari, McLaren and Porsche were busy demonstrating just how biblical a combination such as this could be.


View the Honda NSX cars for sale on driving.co.uk


I kept calling Honda to ask when I could drive its new offering and was always told the same thing. “Soon.” It said the design and engineering team in California was “benchmarking” the Chevrolet Corvette, and when this was done it would be ready.

A year later it said the team had decamped to Germany to benchmark various Porsches. And then a year after that it was in Mauritius benchmarking cocktails. I began to think the new NSX was a machine that existed only in Honda’s dreams and that it would never see the light of day.

But then last year, after a quick trip to Sydney to benchmark some surfboards and a stopover in Bali to benchmark a couple of beaches, the tanned and relaxed designers and engineers announced the car was finished.

And I must say it looked good. It’s very low and very wide — wider than almost anything else on the road, in fact. It also appeared to be very clever, since its mid-mounted twin-turbo V6 was fitted with a 47bhp electric motor that would provide power while the turbos were drawing from the well of witchcraft but were not quite ready to deliver it.

The Clarkson Review: 2017 Honda NSX

Furthermore, each front wheel was fitted with its own 36bhp electric motor, which meant this fairly conventional-looking supercar was anything but, under the skin. Can you even begin to imagine, for instance, the computing power needed simply to keep all four wheels rotating at the same speed?

When you start to consider that, you can see why it’s taken so long to get the new NSX from the doodle, “Wouldn’t it be nice?” phase and into the showrooms. Especially when you step inside and realise that despite the behind-the-scenes complexity, it comes with a normal steering wheel, normal pedals, normal paddles for the nine-speed gearbox and a normal price. I’m not being flippant. At £143,950 it’s almost five times less expensive than Porsche’s hybrid alternative.

“The sat nav is woeful. I suspect it’s the same unit you get in a Honda Jazz or Civic, so on the upside it could probably find the nearest beetle drive or bingo hall”

On paper, then, this car looks like a genuinely realistic alternative to Ferrari’s 488 GTB, Lamborghini’s Huracan and whatever car McLaren has just launched. However, it isn’t.

The first problem is that it’s not that quick off the mark. If you are driving in Quiet mode — which you will be most of the time, because the other settings make the car noisy, uneconomical and bumpy — and you put your foot down, there is a very noticeable moment when you just know the computing system is having a think. “Right. Hang on. What gear should I select? Fourth? Fifth? We’ll have a meeting about that, and in the meantime let’s see if we can work out which wheel needs what amount of power. Front left to start with …”

Meanwhile, the driver of the Vauxhall Vectra you were trying to overtake is at home watching Game of Thrones.

So all the clever-clever hybrid tech doesn’t give you the power you were expecting, which would be fine if it gave extra economy, but it doesn’t really do that either. Don’t reckon on getting much more than 20mpg.

Then there’s the handling. You’d imagine that with its weird four-wheel-drive system it’d have a ton of grip, and that’s probably so. But you are never inclined to find out for sure, because you are aware this is a heavy car and nearly a ton of the weight is located in the rear end. So if you went over the limit of grip, it’d be like wrestling a grandfather clock back into line.

What’s more, the steering is numb, and there’s a curious wobble when the car settles into a bend, as though the suspension is having a bit of a row with itself about what it should be doing.

As a car for petrolheads, then, this is no match for its rivals from McLaren, Lamborghini and Ferrari. And then things get worse.

The Clarkson Review: 2017 Honda NSX

The sun visors are the size of stamps and feel as though they’ve been lifted from a Soviet bread van, the horn sounds as if it’s from a Toys R Us pedal car and the sat nav is woeful.

I suspect it’s the same unit you get in a Honda Jazz or Civic, so on the upside it could probably find the nearest beetle drive or bingo hall, but on the downside it’s a touchscreen, which doesn’t work in any car, and the software appears to have been written by Alistair MacLean or some other author of fiction. Twice it told me the road ahead was closed. And it just bloody wasn’t.

Then there’s the stereo, which sounds like Radio Caroline did in the early 1970s, and I wouldn’t mind but the engine doesn’t compensate for this. In the old NSX there was an intoxicating induction roar when you accelerated; in the new one there’s just some gravelly noise. Which you aren’t really hearing, because you’re busy seeing if the carpet is stuck under the throttle pedal.

Worst of all is the fuel gauge. I don’t have OCD, as anyone who has seen my desk will testify, but the needle isn’t centred, so it always looks cock-eyed. And that drove me mad.


Browse NEW or USED cars for sale on driving.co.uk


You are left, once you’ve lived with an NSX for a few days, with a sense that the engineers have beavered away at the difficulties of making a high-performance hybrid and then just garnished it with parts from the factory floor. Everything you touch and look at feels either low rent or annoying.

On a recent television programme my colleague James May said he liked the NSX because he found it interesting. Later he told me that the car’s lack of apparent acceleration has something to do with Newton metres per inch per inch and that the linear nature of electric motor delivery … I’m afraid I nodded off at this point.

He is right, though. This car is interesting. And it is pretty. But that, I’m afraid, is the full extent of its repertoire.

 

Head to head

Honda NSX Porsche 911 Turbo S
Price £143,950 £145,773
Power 573bhp 572bhp
0-62mph 2.9sec 2.9sec
Top speed 191mph 205mph

 

The interview: Camilla Long meets Clarkson, Hammond and May

Write to us at driving@sunday-times.co.uk, or Driving, The Sunday Times, 1 London Bridge Street, London SE1 9GF

The post The Clarkson Review: 2017 Honda NSX appeared first on Sunday Times Driving.



source https://www.driving.co.uk/car-reviews/clarkson/clarkson-review-2017-honda-nsx/

Monday, 13 February 2017

Caterham Seven 310 review

“If Caterham was only going to make one car for the rest of its days, this would be it,” declared the boss of Caterham Cars when the Seven 310 was unveiled, last summer. That’s a pretty bold thing to say when it’s not the range-topping version of its legendary lightweight British Sports car. It’s not the most affordable, either. The beauty of this version, says Caterham, is that it’s the perfect blend of power and handling; not too extreme and not too weedy.

The last Caterham Seven Driving tested was the 620 S, which features the company’s most extreme powerplant — a 2-litre supercharged Ford unit producing 310bhp. Weighing just 610kg, or less than half a Ford Focus, it blew our socks off. Or bobble hat, at least.

The experience behind the wheel of the new 310 is far less hair-raising. It has the same 1.6-litre Ford Sigma engine that can be found on the Seven 270, but with an uprated engine that was developed for the Caterham Seven Supersport racing series so that it now produces 152bhp instead of 135bhp. Caterham says it had only intended to offer 270 customers the more powerful engine as an upgrade (which it does), but decided the new engine deserved a model in its own right.


View the Caterham Sevens for sale on driving.co.uk


Combined with the featherweight chassis (the complete package weighs 540kg), the resulting 281bhp per tonne still makes the car feel very lively, but not ridiculously so. Max power comes at 7,000rpm and it’s more than possible to spin the rear wheels when pushing the needle that far round the dial, but it’s a car that will tend towards controlled understeer rather than spinning you round in circles and can feel surprisingly settled at a canter.

In fact, cruising around town is an enjoyable experience rather than the exhausting beast-taming chore of the 620 S. The latter sounds like an oil barrel full of angry hornets but the noise from the 310 exhaust is a low, distinctive growl with a few friendly pops from the exhaust when shifting down through the gears letting you know that, although it’s not a fire-breather, it’s no pussycat, either.

“The noise from the 310 exhaust is a low, distinctive growl with a few friendly pops from the exhaust when shifting down”

Meanwhile, the standard road suspension (sport suspension is available) keeps the car flat and level through corners while remaining compliant and offering comfort on uneven surfaces. There’s no need to avoid roads with particularly aggressive speed bumps, for example.

The cabin is less of a squeeze than the 620 S, too (particularly with the wide-body S5 chassis), with wider, more comfortable seats and a three-point seatbelt as standard, rather than a full racing harness, which makes climbing in and out less exhausting. Having said that, buyers may want the extra reassurance that the optional four-point harness (£250) provides.

Caterham Seven 310 review

As standard you get rubber mats and boot floor carpet and black cloth seats but there isn’t much else from a comfort point of view. A fully-carpeted interior is £115 extra and if you want a heater, that’ll be a further £300. The latter, we would argue, is essential.

Our car came with the S Pack, which includes the above plus a full windscreen (an “aeroscreen” is standard), hood and sidescreens, black leather seats, Momo steering wheel and a choice of four paint finishes, as well as a unique key, gearknob and instruments, although at £2,995 buyers may want to pick and choose upgrades for the base car.

Those wishing to buy something more suited to track days can opt for Caterham’s R pack (pictured), which adds a limited slip differential, a lightweight flywheel, more powerful brakes, the sport suspension, racing seats and gearshift lights. But for us, the 310 works best as an all-rounder rather than a track-focused machine; the S Pack version is, indeed, a perfect blend of power, handling and relative comfort.

Having said that, climbing in and out over the side exhaust with the full hood attached is still an art not best suited to the less nimble. The appeal of a Caterham Seven, though, is that in an age of traction control, dual-zone climate control, parking sensors and Apple Car Play, it remains resolutely old-school.  And long may it continue.

 

* As a low volume manufacturer, Caterham is not required to put its vehicles through the official NEDC economy and emissions tests

The post Caterham Seven 310 review appeared first on Sunday Times Driving.



source https://www.driving.co.uk/car-reviews/caterham-seven-310-review/

Friday, 10 February 2017

First Drive review: 2017 Toyota Prius Plug-in

TOYOTA has been watching the recent commotion around diesel with some interest. The Japanese company has been banging on about low-emission petrol-electric hybrid technology for decades and now offers hybrid versions of most of its range, from the little Yaris to the RAV4 crossover. Its sister company, Lexus, does the same with its upmarket range.

The model that spearheaded this movement was the Prius. Would you believe that the original poster car of the hybrid petrol-electric eco movement is now in its fourth generation?

The Prius Plug-in is in effect two cars in one: electric power for short trips, which constitute most of our driving, and hybrid propulsion for long-distance motoring without the inconvenience of having to recharge.


View the Toyota Prius cars for sale on driving.co.uk


Last month, alternatively fuelled cars — hybrids and all-electric models — accounted for 4.2% of all new cars sold. It’s the first time they have surpassed 4% of the market, says the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders.

We have been running extended tests of some of these cars, including the Audi A3 e-tron and BMW 225xe, and both have proved a viable alternative to diesel-powered family cars, so long as you have access to a charging point.

Toyota first launched a plug-in hybrid version of its Prius in 2012. It could travel up to 15 miles on electric power alone before the petrol engine needed to lend a hand. Toyota reasoned that most trips are less than 15 miles, so the range of the Prius Plug-in was perfectly adequate for most drivers’ needs. However, a lukewarm response and rival models capable of travelling further on battery power alone forced a rethink.

So with the second-generation Prius Plug-in tested here, Toyota has more than doubled the battery-powered range to 39 miles (according to the official, optimistic EU figures). You could also break the national speed limit using just the battery: it will operate in isolation up to 84mph, an appreciable jump from the 51mph of its predecessor.

The car is said to be capable of returning up to 283mpg, and to emit just 22g/km of CO2, but to get anywhere near such figures you’ll have to confine your driving to a laboratory. Or drive on battery power alone, in which case why not buy a pure-electric car?

Toyota says its new Prius Plug-in isn’t just a standard fourth-gen Prius packed with a bigger battery; it’s a distinct model in its own right. For a start, there are cosmetic changes to the nose, including a bespoke light cluster, that lend it a more aggressive look than the standard Prius. At the rear, a smart double-bubble on the rear window continues into the line of the spoiler, while the rear lights are spread horizontally rather than vertically, as on the non-plug-in car.

It’s bigger, too, with a 25mm longer nose and what a lonely hearts ad might refer to as a more generous back end (the rear overhang is a full 80mm larger). This is to accommodate a new, larger (8.8kWh) and more powerful (3.3kW) high voltage battery below the boot floor. The increased length doesn’t increase interior space over the standard Prius and, in fact, the central seat in the rear is sacrificed to accommodate electrical components, making this a strict four-seat car. Otherwise, the interior is virtually identical to the Prius Mk 4.

First Drive Review: 2017 Toyota Prius Plug-in

A new battery warming system helps keep freezing temperatures (as low as -20C) from playing havoc with its chemistry and diminishing electric range, while the drivetrain now benefits from dual motors thanks to a clever trick that can turn the hybrid generator into a motor in itself, increasing power by 83%, according to Toyota.

Other technical features impress, too. LED adaptive headlights turn into corners and dip full beam around oncoming cars, so as not to dazzle drivers while providing maximum illumination of the rest of the road. A gas-injection heat pump — a world first for a production car, Toyota tells us — warms the cabin three times more efficiently than a standard air conditioning system and so doesn’t drain the battery so fast, and can heat the cabin and start the engine in temperatures down to -10C. It can also be charged faster than before: two hours with a fast charger or three hours 10 minutes from a standard UK wall socket.

Perhaps the most eyebrow-raising addition to the new car is an optional solar roof panel. Photovoltaic panels on cars have generally been used to help run low-powered devices such as the infotainment system, but the ones on the roof of the new Prius Plug-in feed into the main hybrid drive system to help move the car. Toyota reckons, in London sunlight, the panels can generate enough go for 400 miles of electric driving every year. Or if you live in sunny Rome, 715 miles per year. That’s not to be sniffed at.

The way it feeds into the hybrid battery is ingenious, too. Merging a low voltage electrical supply into a high voltage system “is a challenge”, says the Japanese car maker. It was overcome by adding a small, intermediary battery that is drip-fed power from the roof over time and, when it fills up it dumps the entire stored charge into the high voltage battery in one large pulse. Imagine a toilet cistern, only filled with electricity.

First Drive Review: 2017 Toyota Prius Plug-in

But there’s a price for this cleverness, namely £1,500 on top of the £34,895 (before any government discount for plug-in cars). That works out at £3.75 per mile over the first year for London-based drivers. But then, of course, the cost drops for every subsequent year. Keep the car for two years and it works out at £1.88 per mile; three years, £1.25. The real value will be for secondhand buyers. Uber drivers, take note.

Interesting aside: opt for the solar roof and Toyota will remove a few of the other tech options on this car: colour head-up display, Blind Spot Monitor and Rear Cross Traffic Alert (both use sensors to check for objects beside or behind the car). When quizzed on this, a spokesperson revealed that weight is the problem.

It’s difficult to imagine how much weight a head-up display adds to a car, but it’s too much if you want to power your car in part by the sun. And so are leather seats: forget them. If you want the range-topping Excel spec car, solar panels aren’t an option. Perhaps Toyota is deliberately targeting this at the aforementioned Uber drivers?

Which makes you think: how much does the car weigh? Is it some lumbering elephant of the road? Well, it’s not light at up to 1,550kg, but on the road it doesn’t feel excessively weighty. Throw it into a corner and body roll is more than acceptable and it becomes patently obvious on twisty roads that it is perfectly decent in the handling department, particularly when compared with its predecessor.

It feels at its happiest as a car about town

Yes, the front end can begin to lose grip on the tightest corners when really pushing hard, and through a long, quick right-hander it did dip the front left corner somewhat, but who will push a Prius hard in everyday driving? On the whole Toyota has done a fine job of finding a nice balance despite the weighty battery at the rear of the car.

On the motorway the ride comfort was decent. The retuned suspension and small, 15in wheels with thick tyres help here, and added sound deadening over the standard model reduces road and wind noise.

The continually variable transmission, which for the uninitiated works in a similar way as an automatic but with no gears, results in the 1.8-litre petrol engine whirring away in a sliding scale of disconcertingly monotonous tones. It’s a deeply uninvolving power delivery, and acceleration is lacklustre, but through 20 years of engineering development the throttle response is at least lightning fast, even if overall performance isn’t thrilling. Toyota talks up the smooth acceleration but smooth isn’t always best; just ask peanut butter fans.

It feels at its happiest as a car about town. Switch on the EV City mode to disengage the petrol engine and run on electric, and you still get better acceleration than in the standard hybrid car. HV (hybrid)/EV (electric) mode is used out of town and will seamlessly provide the best combination of petrol-electric power for any given situation, while a new Battery Charge mode will generate electricity to fill the battery for use later in the trip. In addition to these powertrain settings, there are three driving modes: Normal, Eco and, amusingly, Power.

It’s not a cheap car, starting at a lofty £32,395 – close to a BMW 330e

Toyota has modest ambitions for sales of the new Prius Plug-in: just 435 sales in the UK this year, most of which will go to fleet (company car) buyers. Given it’s not by any means a cheap car, starting at a lofty £32,395 (including the £2,500 government incentive), which pits it not far off the cost of an entry-level BMW 330e plug-in hybrid, this seems a fairly realistic prediction.

Tax changes coming in April also penalise anything other than pure-electric cars, and the Toyota doesn’t offer any savings over the BMW or any other alternatively-fuelled car costing less than £40,000 when new. In fact, plug-in hybrid buyers only save £10 per year over diesel or petrol cars from the second year after a car is registered.

With the introduction of mass-market, low-cost and long-range pure electric cars expected over the next five years, will the plug-in hybrid be looked back on as a stepping stone on the road to cleaner, greener motoring? Toyota’s engineers probably know the answer, but for now, unsurprisingly, they aren’t saying.

Toyota Prius Mk 4 review (2016 on)

The post First Drive review: 2017 Toyota Prius Plug-in appeared first on Sunday Times Driving.



source https://www.driving.co.uk/car-reviews/first-drive-review-2017-toyota-prius-plug/

Wednesday, 8 February 2017

800 Horsepower Yenko Camaro

SVE Unveils 800 Horsepower Yenko Camaro

 

Yenko-SV-Camaaro-window-tinting-near-me

Known for building some of the fastest Chevrolets of all time, Don Yenko would be proud to see his name living on. Specialty Vehicle Engineering (formerly known as Street Legal Performance, or SLP) have built incredible versions of GM cars since 1992. Back then it seemed impossible to reach 350 hp while keeping the EPA happy but Ed Hamburger and his son David designed a revolutionary intake and exhaust system for Camaro and Firebird. Fast forward to 2017 and they are still as innovative as ever.

To take a new Camaro to 800 hp is no easy task, so the stock 6.2 liter V8 is bored and stroked to 6.8 liters (416 cubic inches). The new bottom end is completely forged and topped by CNC ported & polished heads. The camshaft is a top-secret design, but it probably has a longer intake duration to make use of the boost. The blower is also proprietary to SVE, and it probably moves more air than most V6 engines.

To fit all that goodness under the stock hood would be impossible, so a new carbon fiber hood is painted to match the Camaro’s factory paint. I can attest to the quality of their paint as I am restoring my 2002 Camaro SS. My hood and rear spoiler look new, while the GM paint has aged in a less than graceful manner. A rarity in the aftermarket, SVE includes a 3 year/36,000 mile warranty on the engine, supercharger and body panels. The best feature of the beastly engine is that it’s not limited to the Camaro. SVE offers this package for the Escalade, Corvette and Silverado. As soon as we get our hands on one, expect to see some wild footage here on Autofluence.

 

2017_yenko_big-6-Mobile-window-tint-installation2017_yenko_-Camaro-car-window-tinting-Lifetime-Warranty

2017_yenko_ Camaro - car window tinting2017_yenko_ Camaro Engine - auto window tinting

Learn More

SVE Unveils 800 Horsepower Yenko Camaro

http://blog.dupontregistry.com/chevrolet/sve-unveils-800-horsepower-yenko-camaro/embed/#?secret=ubqyb2kvoM

D.I. Auto Care
4747 E Elliot Rd
Phoenix, AZ 85044
Phone: (480) 233-1529

Mobile Car Tinting Service

var featureBoxVar = “”;
Source: http://cardetailingphoenix.com/index.php/2017/02/08/800-horsepower-yenko-camaro/




source https://cardetailingphx.wordpress.com/2017/02/08/800-horsepower-yenko-camaro/

BMW M3 vs Mercedes-AMG A45

German Drag Race: BMW M3 vs Mercedes-AMG A45

There are plenty of rivals in the automotive world, whether it be between manufacturers, models or even drivers. One of the greatest rivalries has to be between Mercedes-Benz and BMW, two German companies that are constantly competing against each other.

(Dodge Challenger Hellcat vs Ford Mustang GT350)

Archie Hamilton Racing recently took this rivalry to the tarmac and pitted two cars together in different races. The cars in the race were an M3 and an A45 AMG. The races included one from a stop, which gave the A45 and its launch control the advantage. After this drag race came the rolls races from 30 mph and 50 mph.

mercedes-bmw-drag- mobile window tinting

Check out the video below to see who wins the race!

BMW M3 For Sale | Mercedes-Benz For Sale

German Drag Race: BMW M3 vs Mercedes-AMG A45

http://blog.dupontregistry.com/videos/german-drag-race-bmw-m3-vs-mercedes-amg-a45/embed/#?secret=1IMsIHesC2

D.I. Auto Care
4747 E Elliot Rd
Phoenix, AZ 85044
Phone: (480) 233-1529

Window Tinting Mobile Service

var featureBoxVar = “”;
Source: http://cardetailingphoenix.com/index.php/2017/02/08/bmw-m3-vs-mercedes-amg-a45/




source https://cardetailingphx.wordpress.com/2017/02/08/bmw-m3-vs-mercedes-amg-a45/

First Drive review: 2017 Mercedes-AMG GT R

IT’S A well-known fact, at least to motor company bosses, that luxury sports cars are desired by adolescents but bought by the middle-aged. Young men don’t have the money, and even if they did, they couldn’t afford the insurance.

Take the Mercedes-AMG GT R, for example. It looks as though it has been plucked straight from a poster on a teenager’s bedroom wall. Bright colours, fat tyres, huge scoops and a rear aerofoil as big as a dining table. It’s as if Mercedes were aiming to make the next Bond car.

The £143,245 price tag will restrict it to the wealthy, but Mercedes knows that inside the head of every banker or chartered accountant is a juvenile trying to get out (women do buy these vehicles, but the main market is stubbornly male). Accordingly, this car is packed with features that can only be intended to satisfy adolescent streaks.


View the Mercedes-AMG GTs for sale on driving.co.uk


The engine sound, for instance, is deliberately loud. Normally, engineers work tirelessly to eliminate the friction that produces noise, because it equates to inefficiency and wear. Far from removing it from the GT R, Mercedes has engineered more of it.

True, other manufacturers do the same (stand up, Ford and Peugeot), with fake electronic noise, but Mercedes has succeeded by using exhaust valves that make the GT R sound, at idle, like a powerboat tethered to a jetty. There’s a button that ups the level from loud to very loud.

The tyres are Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2s — the choice of racing drivers — and you won’t ever use their cornering ability on a slog round the M25. Indeed, their stickiness increases fuel consumption. But that isn’t the point — you know they’re there if you need them.

“It’s big but nimble, like Muhammad Ali. You wouldn’t guess to drive it that it tips the scales at more than 1½ tons”

Likewise the clever aerodynamics that increase downforce and improve roadholding, and the traction control system with its eight settings — eight! — allowing you to dial from Comfort to Race mode and everything between. And that doesn’t include Off. I challenge anyone — including Tobias Moers, the head of AMG, Mercedes’ tuning division, whose baby this car is — to undergo a blind test and tell which setting he is in. It doesn’t matter, though. You pick one to go with how you feel.

And so it continues. There’s more power — 74bhp of it — than in the original GT, and it has active four-wheel steering. In other words, the back wheels point in the opposite direction to the front wheels at speeds of up to 62mph, and in the same direction at speeds above 62mph.

The result is that this car is dazzlingly, brilliantly fast on straights and through corners. So fast that it will snatch the breath from your lungs as you launch it down the track. It’s big but nimble, like Muhammad Ali. You wouldn’t guess to drive it that it tips the scales at more than 1½ tons or that the distance between the axles is more than 8ft.

Mercedes is keen to crow that the GT R has set a record on the Nürburgring racetrack for the fastest road-legal rear-wheel-drive car (niche sports cars such as the Radical SR8 excepted). It’s a fact to drop casually at the pub — along with your AMG key fob.

First Drive review: 2017 Mercedes-AMG GT R

Completing the lap in 7 minutes and 10.9 seconds, it was quicker by almost 11 seconds than the Ferrari 488 GTB and only a couple of seconds behind the legendary Nissan GT-R Nismo. Maybe the GT R’s Kermit colour scheme suited the circuit’s nickname, “the Green Hell”. This, boasts Mercedes, is the hardest-core, most track-focused of its AMG family.

Unfortunately, though, the car has a problem — and it’s the same one as Bruno Senna has. He is a fine driver, but no matter how hard he tries, he will never be Ayrton. In 2009 Mercedes unveiled the SLS AMG, a sports car that took its inspiration from the 1954 Mercedes 300SL, or “Gullwing”, the fastest production car of its day.

The SLS was the first car that AMG’s designers were given a free rein to sketch from the wheels up by their bosses at Mercedes, and the result was a preposterous thundering tyrannosaur of a machine.

Celebrities climbed out of their Toyota Priuses to acquire one. According to Hollywood websites, its fan club included Eddie Murphy, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Al Pacino, Mark Wahlberg, Sylvester Stallone and Tom Hanks.

Jeremy Clarkson referred to it as “the greatest car in the world”, concluding that “it’s more powerful than a Ferrari 458, just, it’s a little bit louder than a Lamborghini and it’s way more fun than the 911 RS GT Turbo 3S, or whatever this week’s ultimate Beetle (ie, Porsche) is called; this is the thinking man’s supercar.”


Browse NEW or USED cars for sale on driving.co.uk


Of course it couldn’t last. The SLS’s thirsty 6.2-litre engine became a symbol of excess in the austerity years. Bosses in Stuttgart wheeled out an electric version to mollify regulators, but it was like Marlboro offering to sell a few iron lungs to offset millions of cigarettes.

Just five years into production, the SLS was put down and replaced by a decaf GT with an engine only two-thirds the size and no gullwing doors.

Since then, AMG has been trying to use bits of the dead dinosaur’s DNA to make a new monster. The GT R is its best effort yet. It costs £45,000 more than the basic GT but it’s more car for your money and worth it. To keep up with the latest offerings from Ferrari and Porsche, you’ll need the extra power and the four-wheel steering. It’s still no tyrannosaur, but at least it’s a velociraptor. And your teenager will love it.

Jeremy Clarkson is away

Write to us at driving@sunday-times.co.uk, or Driving, The Sunday Times, 1 London Bridge Street, London SE1 9GF

The post First Drive review: 2017 Mercedes-AMG GT R appeared first on Sunday Times Driving.



source https://www.driving.co.uk/car-reviews/first-drive/first-drive-review-2017-mercedes-amg-gt-r/