Friday, 5 May 2017

Extended test: 2017 Audi A4 Avant 3.0 V6 TDI quattro

Driving is testing the three key types of family car over the coming months: a people carrier (Renault Grand Scenic); an SUV (Honda CR-V); and an estate (Audi A4 Avant, seen here). Which will prove the most useful for parents?


  • Model 2017 Audi A4 Avant S Line 3.0 V6 TDI quattro tiptronic
  • Price (with options) £41,550 (£50,245)
  • Delivery date April 5, 2017
  • Options fitted Daytona grey paint (£645); 19 inch ’10-V spoke’ alloy wheels (£900); Matrix LED front and rear lights with dynamic indicators (£650); Extended LED interior lights pack (£100); S line seats with leather/Alcantara (£450); Heated front seats (£300); Electrically adjustable front seats with memory function for driver (£800) Technology Pack (£1,450); Parking Assistance Pack Advanced (£1350); Folding door mirrors with memory function (£225); Audi Virtual Cockpit (£450); Advanced key with hands-free boot opening (£525); Folding tow bar (£850).Total cost of options: £8,695

 

May 4, 2017: All about first impressions

Extended test 2017: Will Dron, Audi A4 Avant

The Audi is easily the dearest of the three family cars Driving is testing at the moment. The A4 Avant (estate) with this large V6 diesel under the bonnet and the top spec S Line trim starts at over £41,000, and the German company has sent us a car with nearly £9,000 worth of options. But what do you get for the money?

Lots of tech, for a start. Keyless entry and start, parking sensors and reversing camera, auto parking, heated electric seats with memory function, tri-zone climate control, hands free boot opening and the very cool virtual cockpit (100% digital instrument panel), for a start. Lots to discuss on the gadget front; what do you need, and what’s a little frivolous.

We’d assumed that one immediate disadvantage would be that the comparatively large 3 litre V6 diesel engine would be considerably less fuel efficient than the four-cylinder motors of the Honda and Renault. It is claimed to return 52.3mpg on the mixed conditions test cycle, which is promising, but I’ve had the car for a month now and so far I’ve been getting less than 40mpg on most trips. A proper fuel efficiency report will follow at a later date. It has to be said, though, it appears to be a peach of an engine: so smooth and refined it could be mistaken for a punchy petrol.

The look of the car is conservative and understated, but classy, which appeals to me. With the V6 motor underneath the load-lugging estate bodyshape, it could be a “Q car” (i.e. a wolf in sheep’s clothing): we’ll check out its performance potential over the coming months, too. It’s only right and proper.

And the ride is superb. I tested the new A4 saloon in Germany’s Black Country, through hilly terrain, and found it to be the first in a long time (perhaps ever?) to be a match for the BMW 3-series for ride and handling. First impressions suggest that’s no different on the estate.

We’ll find out more about that, and how well the estate handles everything a young family can throw at it, in due course.

Got a question about the Audi A4 Avant? Keep an eye on this page and contact me via my Twitter feed, @wdron.

The post Extended test: 2017 Audi A4 Avant 3.0 V6 TDI quattro appeared first on Sunday Times Driving.



source https://www.driving.co.uk/car-reviews/extended-test-2017-audi-a4-avant-3-0-v6-tdi-quattro/

Extended test: 2017 Honda CR-V 1.6 i-DTEC

Driving is testing the three key types of family car over the coming months: an estate (Audi A4 Avant); a people carrier (Renault Grand Scenic); and an SUV (Honda CR-V, seen here). Which will prove the most useful for parents?


  • Model 2017 Honda CR-V EX 1.6 i-DTEC EX 4WD automatic
  • Tested by Nick Rufford (@ST_Driving)
  • Price (with options) £35,280 (£39,550)
  • Delivery date March, 2017
  • Mileage at start 8,500 miles
  • Options fitted Aero Pack (£1,600); 19 inch Orion alloy wheels (£2,095); Detachable tow bar (£575). Total cost of options: £4,270.

 

May 4, 2017: Hello, Honda

Extended test 2017: Honda CR-V

SUVs like the Honda CR-V are synonymous with school-run mums and dads these days. A high up driving position and imposing road presence are key but are they really the best option for parents?

This is the fourth generation Honda CR-V, and an all-new replacement is due to go on sale next year, so it’s likely that drivers should be able to drive a hard bargain when walking into any Honda showroom in the interim.

That’s not to say that the current model doesn’t look contemporary. It has a distinctive look, helped in part by an optional body styling kit that the Japanese company calls an Aero Pack.

Our extended test car uses the 1.6-litre diesel engine, and this is paired with four-wheel drive and a nine-speed automatic gearbox. Honda says this combination means it can achieve 55mpg and emit 139g/km.

Also of note: it’s got a tow bar to which you can fit a bike carrier, which will undoubtedly see some use.

Got a question about the Honda CR-V? Look out for updates on this page as we get to grips with the car over the coming months, and ask us questions via the @ST_Driving Twitter account.

The post Extended test: 2017 Honda CR-V 1.6 i-DTEC appeared first on Sunday Times Driving.



source https://www.driving.co.uk/car-reviews/extended-test-2017-honda-cr-v-1-6-i-dtec/

The Clarkson Review: Skoda Kodiaq

MOST PEOPLE think that despite Russia and America’s wildly different political viewpoints, they have never been engaged in an actual fighty war. But that’s not accurate. In the early 19th century Alaska was Russian and there were a lot of bouts of fisticuffs between the locals and their masters.

Today, in these troubled times, lessons can be learnt from how the dispute was solved: America simply bought the entire territory, lock, stock and no smoking barrels.

This meant that the main settlement on Kodiak Island became a thriving fishing port where people would catch salmons and halibuts, and tourists from Texas could come to shoot bears.


Browse NEW or USED cars for sale


Kodiak means, in the local language, “island”. So technically it’s called “Island Island”. In the 1960s it made the news because a bit of geological jiggery-pokery meant that the ground nearby suddenly rose by 30ft . This tectonic boing and subsequent tsunami wiped out much of the fishing fleet and almost all the industry that supported it and now it exists mainly as a rugged outpost for people in checked shirts and Wrangler jeans, who I’m sure will not be best pleased that the name of their island has been nailed to the back of a Skoda people carrier.

Actually, I’ll be accurate. To avoid any legal unpleasantness, Skoda has changed the final “k” to a “q”, but the message is clear. This is a car for the great outdoors. It’s for the people who know, when they’re confronted by a bear, what to do. Not like you and me, who would stand there thinking, “I know I should run if it’s a grizzly and stand my ground if it isn’t . . . Or is it the other way round? And what sort of bear is that anyway? And how does this gun work?”

Of course, a name on its own is not enough. You can call your son Astroflash Butch, but it’s going to be no good if he grows up to have a concave chest and arms like pipe cleaners.

This is a problem for Skoda, because we all know that behind the He Man name, this car is just a stretched Volkswagen Golf on stilts. We know it’s a seven-seat school-run special. We know it’s as suburban as pampas grass and prosecco. It’s a Volvo XC90 for women whose second-hand clothes business is not going quite as well as they’d hoped.

To try to fool us, Skoda has fitted a little button on the centre console that says “off road”. That sits there, serving as a constant reminder that you are a person who knows how to gut a rabbit and live on a diet of nothing but your own urine. It lets your passengers know that you may have been in the special forces. You have a Kodiaq. And it’s not just a glorified Golf. That little button says it can go over the Andes.

First of all, though, you have to pull away from the lights, and that’s not easy in the diesel version I was driving because to make sure the engine doesn’t kill any sea otters, and that it sits well inside the post-Dieselgate EU parameters of what is acceptable, the computer has been given a set of algorithms, and power is only ever a last resort.

“It’s pretending to be something it isn’t, with its “Off road” button, but when you look at it as a sensible, seven-seat school-run car, it makes a deal of sense”

Sensors take note of the air pressure, the incline of the road, the outside temperature, the gear that has been selected and the throttle position, and then the computer decides that, no, continuing to sit there is by far the best option for the planet.

So you put your foot down a bit more and the sensors get busy once again before deciding that moving off would cause someone to have bronchitis. So you mash your foot into the firewall, which causes the sensors to think, “OK. He really wants to move, so I’ll select seventh gear, which means it’s all done nice and slowly and with minimal damage to Mother Nature.”

Happily, the EU has now changed its mind on diesels and has decided they are the work of Satan, which means taxes and parking charges for such cars will rocket. Which means in turn that if you choose to buy a Kodiaq, you’ll buy one with a petrol engine. Good idea. At least that’ll move occasionally.

Unless your foot slips off the throttle. I’m not quite sure how, or why, this has been achieved, but you drive a Kodiaq while sitting in the same position you adopt at a piano. And unless you have very long feet, your toes won’t quite reach the throttle.

Apart from that, all is well on the inside. Well, nearly all is well. My test car had been fitted with an optional glass sunroof, which would be ideal for someone who wanted to waste £1,150. I thought sunshine roofs had been consigned to the history books, and this one serves as a reminder of why that should be so. Because when you open it, you get no air, and no sense of being outside; just a lot of extra noise.

Apart from that, though, the wood on the dash was fun, the Volkswagen infotainment sat nav control module worked brilliantly and the comfort at slow speed around town was nice. This is not a car that’s fazed by speed bumps.

At higher speed? I’m not sure, because every time I tried to put my foot down, the computer did some maths and reckoned acceleration wasn’t climatically wise. What I can tell you is that if your foot doesn’t fall off the throttle pedal and you accelerate very gently, it will reach 70mph on the motorway, where all is extremely quiet.

Handling? It’s no good, but that’s OK. If you wanted a car that went round corners well, you’d buy a Golf. Not a Golf on stilts.

The reason you buy this is because tucked away into the boot floor are two seats that can be used to carry very small people over very short distances. But not, at the same time, a dog.

At the weekend I went to my farm with it, as I had a number of manly jobs to do, such as padlocking the gates to stop local ruffians riding around the fields on their hateful motorcycles. The weather was extremely fine, the ground was rock hard and Chipping Norton in no way resembled the permanently wet and often icy conditions of Kodiak Island. But after just a few yards the Skoda was stuck.

And that’s OK too, because if you want a farm car, you’re going to buy a quad bike.


Browse NEW or USED cars for sale


I like the idea of Skoda. It’s a way of buying a new Volkswagen for less. And there is no question it makes some good cars. The Yeti is fabulous, and the Kodiaq’s not bad either. It’s pretending to be something it isn’t, of course, with its “Off road” button and its diamond prospector name, but when you look at it as a sensible, seven-seat school-run car, it makes a deal of sense. Especially as it costs only £35,210 — and that’s the top-of-the-range model.

Just don’t buy the stupid diesel. Partly because climate scientists have decided this month that diesel is bad, and partly because the only reason it gives good economy is because it’s programmed not to work at all.

Head to head: Skoda Kodiaq v Land Rover Discovery Sport

Kodiaq 2.0 TDI 190PS 4×4 DSG Edition Disco Sport SE Tech TD4 180PS Auto 4WD
Price £35,210 £36,420
Fuel 49.6mpg 53.3mpg
CO2 151g/km 139g/km
Boot space (with 7 seats) 270 litres 194 litres

 

Write to us at driving@sunday-times.co.uk, or Driving, The Sunday Times, 1 London Bridge Street, London SE1 9GF

The post The Clarkson Review: Skoda Kodiaq appeared first on Sunday Times Driving.



source https://www.driving.co.uk/car-reviews/clarkson/clarkson-review-skoda-kodiaq/

Wednesday, 3 May 2017

BMW 330e iPerformance review (2017 on)

HAVE YOU ever had a eureka moment, while pouring milk over your morning Cornflakes, and decided that nothing could possibly be better than a car with two engines?

No? Not many people have. So why are the world’s car makers forcing their engineers to work long into the night to create cars that have both petrol and electric motors?

The answer, we’re told, is to reduce exhaust emissions. Yet while the carbon dioxide-based car tax system has encouraged millions of drivers to adopt diesel cars, which emit less CO2 than petrol-powered models, there has been no rush to snap up highly tax efficient plug-in cars. Sales since the introduction of the plug-in car grant, in 2011, sales have amounted to a miniscule 94,541 cars, so slow that the icebergs will have melted before any meaningful CO2 reduction could hope to be achieved.


Browse NEW or USED cars for sale


There’s a simple reason for this that governments and car makers often forget. People are not stupid. Despite all the economic support lavished upon the manufacturers of these models, most drivers view electric and plug-in hybrid cars as being about as useful as a hosepipe in the Sahara.

The reasons are many. For one thing, charging high voltage batteries takes much longer than a fill up at Esso, even when “rapid charging”. Also, wires have to be trailed all over the place. Then there’s the fact that claimed battery range is the stuff of fairy tales, and varies greatly depending on temperature and driving style – yet public charging points rarely work. And they’re heavier than petrol and diesel equivalents, and so generally feel more cumbersome to drive.

If ever there were going to be solutions to such problems, surely it would come from BMW, self-proclaimed creators of the “ultimate driving machine”?

Since 2014, it has offered the i3 and i8 electric and plug-in hybrid electric cars. As cars go, these are radical things and of interest to a select audience. So BMW is attempting to widen its appeal with a range of plug-in hybrid electric cars that look perfectly at home on the driveway of an accountant’s home in Surrey.

Buyers can choose from an SUV (the X5), a people carrier (the 225xe) and three saloons (the 3, 5 and 7-series). All sit within what the company calls the iPerformance range.

Its 330e iPerformance, reviewed here, features in the top 10 best-selling plug-in cars. The only posh saloon to outsell it is the Mercedes 350e.

The best battery range achieved when driven gingerly was 11 miles

The 330e comprises a 2-litre petrol engine producing 182bhp and an 87bhp electric motor. These send power through an eight-speed gearbox to the rear wheels.

Like most plug-in hybrids cars, the efficiency claims are impressive. BMW says it will return up to 148.7mpg, and can be driven on battery power alone for “around 25 miles”. With the two power sources combined for maximum performance, the 330e can accelerate from 0-62mph in 6.1 seconds and hit a top speed of 140mph. Yet it qualifies for the government’s plug-in car grant, of £2,500.

Let’s examine the electric-only range first. Faced with the school run, and temperate weather conditions, the best it achieved when driven gingerly was 11 miles, when set to Max eDrive mode.

That’s a bit different to “around 25 miles”. And it’s notably worse than the Audi A3 e-tron that Driving ran on extended test.

Equally annoying is the car’s habit of draining the battery power when left to its own devices in the day-to-day Auto eDrive operating mode, which is supposed to juggle the petrol engine and electric motor to best meet the demands of the driver. It seemed overly keen to exclusively use the electric motor.

BMW 330e review

The final setting is Save Battery, and it’s telling that this is possibly the most enjoyable of the three, as the 2-litre petrol engine is a smooth unit with good response low in the rev range and a nice growl at the top of the rev range. And in general, the engine feels well integrated with the electric motor and works smoothly through the eight-speed automatic gearbox.

Without any support from the electric motor, though, the fuel economy hovers just over 40mpg.

Unfortunately, the extra weight (230kg more than a 320i M Sport) that the car has to lug around is noticeable on the road. The fantastic body control and composure of a normal, petrol 3-series is missing, and the firm ride comfort will remind everyone on board that Britain’s roads are falling to bits.

And it’s not often that the brakes of modern cars don’t feel up to the task, but this BMW’s often felt like they were struggling, even in day-to-day driving conditions.

The battery, which takes just over three hours to charge on a household socket, is under the boot floor, robbing it of over 100 litres of luggage capacity compared with a regular 3-series saloon. But the cabin space remains unimpeded.

It appears, then, that BMW hasn’t managed to fix all the problems that introducing two motors to a car entails.

So the only reason for buying a 330e is to reduce your company car tax bill. A top rate tax payer would pay £1,340, £1,935 and £2,382 in 2017, 2018 and 2019 respectively for the privilege of owning a £37,275 330e M Sport.

Whereas a 320 ED Sport automatic, which costs £33,420, would land company car drivers with tax bills of £2,924, £3,190 and £3,588 over the same periods. A petrol-powered 320i M Sport auto costs more still.

So the 330e is a car that puts a smile on an accountant’s face. But for the majority of drivers, it’s another example of how plug-in cars aren’t up to the task.

Extended Test: 2016 BMW 2-series Active Tourer PHEV

The post BMW 330e iPerformance review (2017 on) appeared first on Sunday Times Driving.



source https://www.driving.co.uk/car-reviews/bmw-330e-iperformance-review-2017/

Tuesday, 2 May 2017

The Clarkson Review: Renault Twingo GT

WHEN RENAULT introduced its latest Twingo, many motoring journalists scoffed. They said it was slow, and that if you pushed it hard through the corners, it would understeer instead of settling into a nice, smoky drift.

Well, I’m sorry for gaping in astonishment like a wounded fish, but what were they expecting? It’s a city car with a rear engine that would be dismissed by coffee lovers as too weak to grind their beans. So of course it wasn’t going to be fast, and of course its tail wouldn’t swing wide in the corners, because it would mostly be driven by the sort of people who’d crap themselves if it did.

Criticising the baby Renault for not being an out-and-out racer is like buying a record player and criticising it for not being any good at unblocking the sink.


Browse NEW or USED cars for sale


The problem is that Renault put the engine at the back. So everyone thought, “Well, if it’s there, as it is in a Porsche 911, then it must feel like a Porsche 911.” Er, no. The engine in a small Peugeot is at the front, as it is in a Ferrari California, but the two cars feel alike only in the sense that you must sit down to drive them.

And speaking of Peugeot: a friend of mine recently bought a horrible 108 for his daughter. “Why have you done that?” I wailed. “You must hate her. It’s a terrible car.” He listened as I droned on about how tinny it was, and how everything inside felt cheap, and then he said, “Yes. But she gets three years’ free insurance, which saves me six grand.”

This is what we tend to forget in this business. While we are looking for handling anomalies as we drift through Stowe corner at 120mph, it doesn’t occur to us that most people care about safety and running costs and don’t care about tread shuffle or an ability to deal smoothly with mid-corner bumps when you’re at the limit.

Which brings me back to the Twingo. I didn’t like it either, really, because I can’t see the point of a “city car”. Yes, it costs about 75p, but that is hardly good value if you have to leave it at home every time you want to travel more than 30 miles.

You may sneer at this. You may say that if it has an engine, it’s perfectly capable of motorway travel. And who cares if it’s a bit bouncy and noisy and strained? Hmmm. This argument doesn’t wash, because, actually, a very small car with a very small engine is not really capable of handling a motorway.

You put your foot down on the slip road and accelerate so hard that the valves start to make dents in the bonnet, but you’ll barely be doing 55mph by the time you’re ready to join the motorway. Which is a problem, because your path to the inside lane is blocked by a lorry doing 56mph.

‘It’s a hoot to out-accelerate most family saloons and then bomb along in a car that really belongs in a Hot Wheels set’

What do you do? You can’t pull out, because you’ll be squidged. You can’t accelerate, because the engine is giving all it’s got to give. And you can’t slow down, because it would take too long to get back up to a reasonable speed again.

Then there’s the issue of hills. In my daughter’s old Fiesta, which had a 0.00001-litre engine, you’d have to start thinking about the M40 incline over the Chilterns when you were still several miles north of Banbury. And even then you’d reach the summit huffing and puffing like me when I walk to the top of the stairs.

Off the motorway things are no better, because in a small-engined small car you are forced to drive at the speed of the driver in front. If he’s on a tractor, this is very annoying. It is so annoying that eventually you will attempt to overtake, and this will result in your death because you simply do not have the grunt to get past in much less than four hours.

Make no mistake, then. Cars designed to work only in the city are silly, because in the city you have Ubers and proper cabs and Tubes and buses and bicycle lanes. It’s the one place you don’t need a car. And in the place where you do — which is everywhere else — city cars are noisy and dangerous.

And that brings me to the Renault Twingo GT. It started in life as a city car, but it has been breathed on to give it some real-world poke. It still has a tiny, 0.9-litre three-cylinder engine, but it’s turbocharged, so it produces a thrummy, off-beat 108 brake horsepower. This is a car that sounds like one of those very small dogs that growl the growl of a Great Dane. I liked it. It was amusing.

And I liked the speed too. I know 108bhp doesn’t sound much, but it’s what you used to get from the original Golf GTI. And no one said that was too slow for motorways.

The power delivery is a bit weird — it comes in lumps — but it’s a hoot to out-accelerate most family saloons and then bomb along in a car that really belongs in a Hot Wheels set.

The way it handles is less impressive. The steering is done by guesswork — there’s no feel at all — and you never have any clue that the engine’s at the back. Sporty it is not. And that’s fine, because this, after all, is a car designed for the city that happens to have the poke to deal with everywhere else as well.

And it looks tremendous. It’s pretty anyway, and with a dinky rear air scoop to feed the turbo, and twin exhausts, it’s brilliant. Mine was fitted with the optional stripes, which made it feel like a soap-box racer and me feel I was nine. It made me smile.

And that’s before we get to the really impressive stuff. I went out one night with another grown-up in the front and three teenagers in the back. There was quite a lot of complaining, I admit, but the fact is that we fitted. And if I accelerated hard, the whizzy little engine drowned out the moaning.


Browse NEW or USED cars for sale


The only problem with doing this is that the engine gets hot, which means anything you have in the boot gets hot too. This is a car that can turn your weekly shop into a delicious, piping-hot omelette before you get home.

Oh, and then there’s the turning circle: it seems to be able to turn in its own length. It makes a black cab look cumbersome.

So there we are: a nifty, practical car that looks good, goes well and makes you happy. And all for £14,000. It hasn’t won many fans with writers in the specialist press, because they still think it should go and handle like a 911. But I liked it a lot, because the comparison never entered my head.

Head to head: Renault Twingo GT v Abarth 595

Twingo GT Abarth 595
Price £14,085 £15,260
Fuel 54.3mpg 47.1mpg
0-62mph 9.6sec 7.8sec
Top speed 113mph 130mph

 

Write to us at driving@sunday-times.co.uk, or Driving, The Sunday Times, 1 London Bridge Street, London SE1 9GF

The post The Clarkson Review: Renault Twingo GT appeared first on Sunday Times Driving.



source https://www.driving.co.uk/car-reviews/the-clarkson-review-renault-twingo-gt/

Wednesday, 26 April 2017

First Production Ford Mustang Coupe

Ford Mustang Coupe Heading To Auction

Window Tinting Mesa

If you are looking for investment grade automobiles, Dana Mecum and Company have a knack for finding irreplaceable cars. It took many years to find the first production Ford Mustang, and the convertible now resides in the Henry Ford Museum. But the first coupe (VIN 002) was among the 121,000+ cars built in the first year, making the search like a needle in a haystack. Ford knew they had a hit on their hands, so the first cars were rushed to dealers. April 17, 1964, was the public unveiling at the World’s Fair in New York, so Ford’s top dealers needed to have a showroom example to land the first orders.

Also, Check Out – Top 10 Fastest Quarter Mile Times (Production Cars)

Mobile Window Tinting Mesa Arizona

As we’re well aware, mistakes happen when shipping cars, so instead of going to a domestic dealership, the first Mustang coupe was banished to the Arctic cold of Whitehorse, in the Yukon Territory.  Since the Mustang was based on the lowly Falcon, many early cars used many of the same parts. Under the hood was a 170 ci straight six engine backed by a three-speed manual. Drum brakes at all corners are hidden by the massive 13″ wheels, but that is how the base model Mustang was able to offer decent performance at a bargain price. We wish Ford would make A/C and power windows optional again. Remember when cars were light and fun?

If you need a new centerpiece for your stable, this Caspian Blue coupe will be the main event of Mecum’s 30th Anniversary Auction. Taking place May 16-21st, the Indiana State Fairground will see many classics find new owners.

First Production Ford Mustang Coupe Heading To Auction

http://blog.dupontregistry.com/news/first-production-ford-mustang-coupe-heading-auction/embed/#?secret=X0a4V6E0Z9

D.I. Auto Care
4747 E Elliot Rd
Phoenix, AZ 85044
Phone: (480) 233-1529
Auto Detailing Tempe

var featureBoxVar = “”;
Source: http://cardetailingphoenix.com/index.php/2017/04/26/first-production-ford-mustang-coupe/




source https://cardetailingphx.wordpress.com/2017/04/27/first-production-ford-mustang-coupe/

New TECHART GrandGT: Porsche Panamera

TECHART has just launched a new model based on the Porsche Panamera, the new GrandGT. The tuning company went ahead and gave the four-door Porsche new exterior and interior components.

On the outside is a list of components that increase the car’s width by 50 mm in the front and 80 mm in the rear. The components include side skirts, wheel arches, engine lid, front apron, rear diffuser, tailgate, and spoiler. Joining these new components are wide 22-inch TECHART alloy wheels with tires sized 285/30 ZR 22 at the front and 335/25 ZR 22 at the rear.

Tempe Arizona Window Tinting

Related – Our Top 10 Most Sought After Porsche 911 Models in 2017 So Far

Inside the GrandGT is a custom-made interior that is created according to each customer. Fine leather, Alcantara and carbon fiber can be used throughout the car’s interior, giving the cabin a refined and personal touch. Customers can also get the TECHART Type-7 sports steering wheel, paddle shifter trim, illuminated door entry guards, aluminum sport pedals and much more.

TECHART will be releasing powerkits and exhaust systems for the GrandGT later this year. To learn more, visit TECHART.de.

The New TECHART GrandGT: Panamera Gone Wild

http://blog.dupontregistry.com/news/new-techart-grandgt-panamera-gone-wild/embed/#?secret=WhhZTbbsuz

D.I. Auto Care
4747 E Elliot Rd
Phoenix, AZ 85044
Phone: (480) 233-1529
Tempe Window Tinting

var featureBoxVar = “”;
Source: http://cardetailingphoenix.com/index.php/2017/04/26/new-techart-grandgt-porsche-panamera/




source https://cardetailingphx.wordpress.com/2017/04/27/new-techart-grandgt-porsche-panamera/